Headquarter Allocation of Resources to Intra-MNE Transfer Projects

In the past several decades research has emphasized innovation development and transfer as key issues when investigating the multinational enterprise (MNE). This thesis focuses on the question of what factors make headquarters involve itself in innovation transfer projects taking place between a sending and a receiving subsidiary within the MNE. This relates to headquarters active participation and role in the organization of resources (structure) and flows (processes) within the MNE. Using a database covering 169 innovation transfer projects the empirical analysis reveals that distances influence headquarters involvement, albeit in different directions. Systematic differences based on subsidiary and innovation characteristics and headquarters involvement is found. Not only subsidiary characteristics are of importance for headquarters involvement, but also the embeddedness of the subsidiary hosting the innovation transfer project. More specifically, physical and cultural distance between the sending and receiving subsidiaries influence headquarters involvement in the transfer negatively, whereas linguistic and economic distance between the subsidiaries conducting the transfer have a positive influence on headquarters involvement in innovation transfer. Looking more closely at the innovations subject to transfer the results suggests that innovations perceived as complex and important are favored for headquarters support. The same is true for innovations that are related to the core business of the subsidiary. At a subsidiary level, powerful subsidiaries initially receive more of headquarters support, but as subsidiary power increase, headquarters becomes less involved, i.e., a curvilinear effect of power is found. Acquired subsidiaries tend to become favored for headquarters involvement in transfer relative to greenfield subsidiaries. Finally, the results indicate that headquarters involves itself in transfer projects when the subsidiaries hosting the transfer projects have been relationally embedded during the innovation development phase. Theoretically, headquarters involvement can be conceptualized as orchestration of innovations within the MNE, and as a form of resource allocation. Thus, this thesis contributes to the understanding of what influences intra-MNE resource allocation, as well as what factors capture the attention of headquarters leading to innovation orchestration. Headquarters involvement in innovation transfer has implications for setting subsidiaries on evolutionary trajectories.

[1]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Conventional and Reverse Knowledge Flows in Multinational Corporations† , 2008 .

[2]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Capture the Attention of Corporate Headquarters , 2007 .

[3]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view , 2007 .

[4]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Intrafirm Competition and Charter Evolution in the Multibusiness Firm , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[5]  R. Mudambi,et al.  Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs , 2004 .

[6]  A. Malmberg,et al.  Subsidiary impact on host-country economies--the case of foreign-owned subsidiaries attracting investment into sweden , 2003 .

[7]  Antoinette Schoar,et al.  Effects of Corporate Diversification on Productivity , 2002 .

[8]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[9]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[10]  Anne-Wil Harzing Acquisitions versus greenfield investments: international strategy and management of entry modes , 2002 .

[11]  P. Williamson,et al.  From global to metanational: how companies win in the knowledge economy , 2001, UBIQ.

[12]  Sheri Tice,et al.  The Bright Side of Internal Capital Markets , 2001 .

[13]  Sharon O'donnell,et al.  MANAGING FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES: AGENTS OF HEADQUARTERS, OR AN INTERDEPENDENT NETWORK? , 2000 .

[14]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[15]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  MNE internal capital markets and subsidiary strategic independence , 1999 .

[16]  Martin J. Carter Managing Cross-Border Complementary Knowledge: Conceptual Developments in the Business Process Approach to Knowledge Management in Multinational Firms , 1999 .

[17]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Multinational Subsidiary Evolution: Capability and Charter Change in Foreign-Owned Subsidiary Companies , 1998 .

[18]  A. Kokko,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Spillovers , 1998 .

[19]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Are Internal capital Markets Efficient , 1998 .

[20]  D. Scharfstein The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets Ii: Evidence from Diversified Conglomerates , 1998 .

[21]  J. Viel,et al.  Some methods to address collinearity among pollutants in epidemiological time series. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  The Dark Side of Internal Capital Markets: Divisional Rent-Seeking and Inefficient Investment , 1997 .

[23]  Refik Culpan The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation , 1997 .

[24]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation , 1996 .

[25]  J. Birkinshaw How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[26]  Owen A. Lamont Cash Flow and Investment: Evidence from Internal Capital Markets , 1996 .

[27]  J. Stein,et al.  Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources , 1995 .

[28]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[29]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[30]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[31]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[32]  Stephen Tallman Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[33]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[34]  Lawrence G. Franko,et al.  Global corporate competition: Who's winning, who's losing, and the R&D factor as one reason why , 1989 .

[35]  John Cantwell,et al.  Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[36]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Internal differentiation within multinational corporations , 1989 .

[37]  John F. Tomer Organizational Capital: The Path to Higher Productivity and Well-Being , 1987 .

[38]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[39]  S. Briggs,et al.  The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales , 1986 .

[40]  G. Hedlund The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[41]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[42]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[43]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[44]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[45]  D. Teece Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[46]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[47]  J. Gower,et al.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[48]  Donald W. Marquaridt Generalized Inverses, Ridge Regression, Biased Linear Estimation, and Nonlinear Estimation , 1970 .

[49]  K. Arrow Control in Large Organizations , 1964 .

[50]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[51]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[52]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Managing the Embedded Multinational , 2005 .

[53]  W. Baumol The Free-Market Innovation Machine - Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism , 2002 .

[54]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The Emergence and Impact of MNC Centres of Excellence: A Subsidiary Perspective , 2000 .

[55]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[56]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[57]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[58]  O. Williamson Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization , 1975 .

[59]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .