Evaluation of mutual funds using multi-dimensional information

To make better use of mutual fund information for decision-making we propose a coned-context, data envelopment analysis (DEA) model with expected shortfall (ES) modeled under an asymmetric Laplace distribution in order to measure risk when evaluating performance of mutual funds. Unlike traditional models, this model not only measures the attractiveness of mutual funds relative to the performance of other funds, but also takes the decision makers’ preferences and expert knowledge/judgment into full consideration. The model avoids unsatisfying and impractical outcomes that sometimes occur with traditional measures and it also provides more management information for decision-making. Determining input and output variables is obviously very important in DEA evaluation. Using statistical tests and theoretical analysis, we demonstrate that ES under an asymmetric Laplace distribution is reliable and we therefore propose the model as a major risk measure for mutual funds. At the same time, we consider a fund’s performance over different time horizons (e.g., one, three and five years) in order to determine the persistence of fund performance. Using the coned-context DEA model with ES value under an asymmetric Laplace distribution, we also present the results of an empirical study of mutual funds in China, which provides significant insights into management of mutual funds. This analysis suggests that the coned context measure will help investors to select the best fund and fund managers in order to identify the funds with the most potential.

[1]  Jack L. Treynor How to Rate Management of Investment Funds , 2012 .

[2]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[3]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  Modelling Financial Time Series , 1987 .

[4]  M. C. Jensen The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964 , 1967 .

[5]  Preyas S. Desai,et al.  Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach , 1997 .

[6]  Thorsten Rheinländer Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond , 2003 .

[7]  P. S. Dharmapala,et al.  DEA/AR efficiency and profitability of 14 major oil companies in U.S. exploration and production , 1996, Comput. Oper. Res..

[8]  Antonella Basso,et al.  Measuring the performance of ethical mutual funds: a DEA approach , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[9]  L. Kin A Method for Evaluating Mutual Funds' Performance based on Asymmetric Laplace Distribution and DEA Approach , 2007 .

[10]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[11]  Jack L. Treynor,et al.  MUTUAL FUND PERFORMANCE* , 2007 .

[12]  Richard Roll,et al.  AMBIGUITY WHEN PERFORMANCE IS MEASURED BY THE SECURITIES MARKET LINE , 1978 .

[13]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming , 1989 .

[14]  W. Sharpe CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[15]  J. Wallenius,et al.  A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[17]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[18]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Risk Management: Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls , 2002 .

[19]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Portfolio Evaluation and Benchmark Selection , 2001 .

[20]  P. Embrechts,et al.  Correlation and Dependency in Risk Management , 2002 .

[21]  P. S. Dharmapala,et al.  Linked-cone DEA profit ratios and technical efficiency with application to Illinois coal mines , 1995 .

[22]  Philippe Artzner,et al.  Coherent Measures of Risk , 1999 .

[23]  Kuo-Ping Chang,et al.  Evaluating mutual fund performance: an application of minimum convex input requirement set approach , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[24]  D. Galagedera,et al.  Australian mutual fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis , 2002 .

[25]  Richard C. Morey,et al.  Mutual fund performance appraisals: a multi-horizon perspective with endogenous benchmarking , 1999 .

[26]  K. Lai,et al.  Study on Incentive Factors of Team Cooperation based on Synergy Effect , 2007 .

[27]  L. Seiford,et al.  Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .

[28]  P. Manimaran,et al.  Modelling Financial Time Series , 2006 .

[29]  B.P.S. Murthi,et al.  Relative performance evaluation of mutual funds: A non-parametric approach , 2001 .

[30]  Antonella Basso,et al.  A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach to Measure the Mutual Fund Performance , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Shouyang Wang,et al.  Empirical Study on Chinese Mutual Funds' Performance , 2007 .

[32]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Risk, the Pricing of Capital Assets, and the Evaluation of Investment Portfolios , 1969 .