Reliability of Small Satellite Networks With Software-Defined Radio and Enhanced Multiple Access Protocol

Space missions exploiting small satellite networks with a use of software-defined radio (SDR) and advanced random access (RA) protocols have attracted an increased amount of attentions given their low costs, low latency levels, low complexity, and yet competitive data rates for global network services. In this article, we derive a mathematical model to demonstrate the reliability of a small satellite network with respect to SDR structures, the transmitted signal power on the uplink/downlink channels, code rates, and packet collisions through an enhanced RA protocol. Our model provides quantitative network reliability with respect to SDR system failure rates, feasible communication parameters, and packet loss ratios. Our analysis suggests a methodology to evaluate network reliability differences according to changes of communication parameters, and a guideline to sustain a reliable network system with appropriate parameter values. We find out that a robust SDR structure with a state-of-the-art analog-to-digital converter can provide reliable network services effectively with reduced power consumption, even with high packet traffic loads, to meet operator-required reliability levels for small satellite networks.

[1]  Pekka Eskelinen,et al.  Satellite Systems for Personal and Broadband Communications , 2001 .

[2]  James Schier,et al.  NASA Near Earth Network (NEN) and Space Network (SN) CubeSat Communications , 2016 .

[3]  Federico Clazzer Modern Random Access for Satellite Communications , 2017, ArXiv.

[4]  Mark D.J. Bowyer,et al.  Feature article: A reconfigurable SDR architecture for parallel satellite reception , 2018, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[5]  Bruce R. Elbert,et al.  Introduction to satellite communication , 1987 .

[6]  Byrav Ramamurthy,et al.  Communication Technologies and Architectures for Space Network and Interplanetary Internet , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  L. Accatino,et al.  The shadow position sensors (SPS) formation flying metrology subsystem for the ESA PROBA-3 mission: present status and future developments , 2016, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  Otilia Popescu,et al.  Power Budgets for CubeSat Radios to Support Ground Communications and Inter-Satellite Links , 2017, IEEE Access.

[9]  Stephen Creaney,et al.  Designing Efficient Digital Up and Down Converters for Narrowband Systems , 2008 .

[10]  Anne Dorothy Marinan From CubeSats to constellations : systems design and performance analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Ramón Martínez Rodríguez-Osorio,et al.  Survey of Inter-Satellite Communication for Small Satellite Systems: Physical Layer to Network Layer View , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Nasir Saeed,et al.  CubeSat Communications: Recent Advances and Future Challenges , 2019, ArXiv.

[13]  Mario Marchese,et al.  Enhancing Contention Resolution ALOHA Using Combining Techniques , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Christian Kissling,et al.  Enhanced Contention Resolution Aloha - ECRA , 2012, ArXiv.

[15]  Jihwan P. Choi,et al.  Predicting system failure rates of SRAM-based FPGA on-board processors in space radiation environments , 2019, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Jakub Korczyk,et al.  Reliable On Board Data Processing System for the ICEYE- 1 satellite , 2016 .

[17]  Brian M. Sadler,et al.  Fundamentals of energy-constrained sensor network systems , 2005, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[18]  Jiangtao Xi,et al.  Energy Efficiency of Massive MIMO Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs and Successive Interference Cancellation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[19]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Hybrid Collision Avoidance-Tree Resolution for M2M Random Access , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[20]  S. Litsyn,et al.  An efficient message-passing schedule for LDPC decoding , 2004, 2004 23rd IEEE Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[21]  John Hanson,et al.  Nodes: A Flight Demonstration of Networked Spacecraft Command and Control , 2016 .

[22]  Riccardo De Gaudenzi,et al.  Contention Resolution Diversity Slotted ALOHA (CRDSA): An Enhanced Random Access Schemefor Satellite Access Packet Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[23]  Bruce Yost EDSN - Edison Demonstration for SmallSat Networks Overview , 2013 .

[24]  Christopher P. Bridges,et al.  Improvements in CPU & FPGA Performance for Small Satellite SDR Applications , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[25]  Simone Morosi,et al.  From Connectivity to Advanced Internet Services: A Comprehensive Review of Small Satellites Communications and Networks , 2019, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[26]  Chitra Patel,et al.  An Optimum Space-to-Ground Communication Concept for CubeSat Platform Utilizing NASA Space Network and Near Earth Network , 2016 .

[27]  Riccardo De Gaudenzi,et al.  On the Satellite Role in the Era of 5G Massive Machine Type Communications , 2018, IEEE Network.

[28]  Mario Marchese,et al.  Small satellites and CubeSats: Survey of structures, architectures, and protocols , 2018, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw..

[29]  Mario Marchese,et al.  IoT Applications and Services in Space Information Networks , 2019, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[30]  Riccardo De Gaudenzi,et al.  Generalized Analytical Framework for the Performance Assessment of Slotted Random Access Protocols , 2014, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..