The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color

Five spatial cuing experiments tested 2 hypotheses regarding attentional capture: (a) Attentional capture is contingent on endogenous attentional control settings, and (b) attentional control settings are limited to the distinction between dynamic and static discontinuities (C. L. Folk, R. W. Remington, & J. C. Johnston, 1992). In Experiments 1 and 2, apparent-motion precues produced significant costs in performance for targets signaled by motion but not for targets signaled by color or abrupt onset. Experiment 3 established that this pattern is not due to differences in the difficulty of target discrimination. Experiments 4 and 5 revealed asymmetric capture effects between abrupt onset and apparent motion related to stimulus salience. The results support the hypotheses of Folk et al. (1992) and suggest that stimulus salience may also play a role in attentional capture.

[1]  S. Anstis.  Recovering motion information from luminance , 1986, Vision Research.

[2]  O. Braddick.  A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[3]  S Ullman,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. , 1987, Science.

[4]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). , 1993 .

[5]  R. Ivry,et al.  Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[7]  J. Theeuwes.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  S. Ullman.  Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[9]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[10]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  S. Petersen,et al.  Visual response properties of neurons in four extrastriate visual areas of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus): a quantitative comparison of medial, dorsomedial, dorsolateral, and middle temporal areas. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990 .

[15]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[17]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Effect of surface medium on visual search for orientation and size features , 1990 .

[18]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[22]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[24]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[26]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[27]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[28]  J. Findlay,et al.  Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Petersik Jt.  The two-process distinction in apparent motion. , 1989 .

[31]  P. McLeod,et al.  Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J E Hoffman,et al.  A two-stage model of visual search , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[35]  J. Jonides.  Towards a model of the mind's eye's movement. , 1980, Canadian journal of psychology.

[36]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  J Miller,et al.  The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  H Pashler,et al.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.