Generalized MHD equations

Abstract Solutions of the d-dimensional generalized MHD (GMHD) equations ∂ t u+u· ∇ u=− ∇ P+b· ∇ b−ν(− Δ ) α u, ∂ t b+u· ∇ b=b· ∇ u−η(− Δ ) β b are studied in this paper. We pay special attention to the impact of the parameters ν,η,α and β on the regularity of solutions. Our investigation is divided into three major cases: (1) ν>0 and η>0, (2) ν=0 and η>0, and (3) ν=0 and η=0. When ν>0 and η>0, the GMHD equations with any α>0 and β>0 possess a global weak solution corresponding to any L2 initial data. Furthermore, weak solutions associated with α⩾ 1 2 + d 4 and β⩾ 1 2 + d 4 are actually global classical solutions when their initial data are sufficiently smooth. As a special consequence, smooth solutions of the 3D GMHD equations with α⩾ 5 4 and β⩾ 5 4 do not develop finite-time singularities. The study of the GMHD equations with ν=0 and η>0 is motivated by their potential applications in magnetic reconnection. A local existence result of classical solutions and several global regularity conditions are established for this case. These conditions are imposed on either the vorticity ω=∇×u or the current density j=∇×b (but not both) and are weaker than some of current existing ones. When ν=0 and η=0, the GMHD equations reduce to the ideal MHD equations. It is shown here that the ideal MHD equations admit a unique local solution when the prescribed initial data is in a Holder space Cr with r>1.

[1]  An Elementary Proof of the Existence and Uniqueness Theorem for the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1999, math/9903042.

[2]  J. L. Lions,et al.  Inéquations en thermoélasticité et magnétohydrodynamique , 1972 .

[3]  Dieter Biskamp,et al.  Nonlinear Magnetohydrodynamics: Index , 1993 .

[4]  Jiahong Wu Viscous and inviscid magneto-hydrodynamics equations , 1997 .

[5]  C. Fefferman,et al.  Geometric constraints on potentially singular solutions for the 3-D Euler equations , 1996 .

[6]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Vorticity and Incompressible Flow: Index , 2001 .

[7]  R. Kohn,et al.  Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the navier‐stokes equations , 1982 .

[8]  Peter Constantin,et al.  Navier-Stokes equations and area of interfaces , 1990 .

[9]  Peter Constantin,et al.  Geometric Statistics in Turbulence , 1994, SIAM Rev..

[10]  Anastasios Mallios Remarks on "singularities" , 2002 .

[11]  Jean-Yves Chemin,et al.  Perfect Incompressible Fluids , 1998 .

[12]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Singularity formation in a class of stretched solutions of the equations for ideal magneto-hydrodynamics , 2001 .

[13]  Eric Ronald Priest,et al.  Magnetic Reconnection: Units , 2000 .

[14]  J. Cooper SINGULAR INTEGRALS AND DIFFERENTIABILITY PROPERTIES OF FUNCTIONS , 1973 .

[15]  W. D. Evans,et al.  PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1941 .

[16]  Russel E. Caflisch,et al.  Remarks on Singularities, Dimension and Energy Dissipation for Ideal Hydrodynamics and MHD , 1997 .

[17]  R. Temam,et al.  Navier-Stokes equations: theory and numerical analysis: R. Teman North-Holland, Amsterdam and New York. 1977. 454 pp. US $45.00 , 1978 .

[18]  Tosio Kato,et al.  Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations , 1984 .

[19]  Eric Ronald Priest,et al.  Magnetic Reconnection: MHD Theory and Applications , 2000 .

[20]  Roger Temam,et al.  Some mathematical questions related to the MHD equations , 1983 .