Environmental Impact Assessment, ecosystems services and the case of energy crops in England

A consequence of the increased requirements for renewable energy is likely to be allocation of more land to bio-energy crop production. Recent regulatory changes in England, as in other parts of the UK, mean that changes in land-use are increasingly subject to screening through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). This paper reviews these regulatory changes and explores the potential benefits of incorporating a fuller examination of ecosystem services within EIA procedures. The authors argue that such an approach could help achieve sustainability by identifying the best options within an area, rather than concentrating on the negative effects of selected proposed projects. It could also help highlight the benefits provided by existing and proposed agricultural, forestry, peri-urban and urban systems. However, successful implementation of an ecosystem services approach would also require a greater understanding of the societal preferences for the full range of ecosystem services at a landscape scale, aswell as the trade-offs and synergies between uses of specific services.

[1]  R. Stone Access to justice in environmental matters , 2014 .

[2]  Oa,et al.  Summary of the National Environmental Policy Act , 2013 .

[3]  Paul J. Burgess,et al.  A framework for reviewing the trade-offs between, renewable energy, food, feed and wood production at a local level , 2012 .

[4]  Alan Bond,et al.  Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal , 2011 .

[5]  D. Deryng,et al.  Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield , 2011 .

[6]  C. Dormann,et al.  Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Francisco J. Escobedo,et al.  A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators , 2011 .

[8]  Ahindra Ghosh,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being , 2013 .

[9]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments , 2011 .

[10]  D. Wade Clean Air Act 1993 , 2011 .

[11]  P. Warren,et al.  A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services , 2010 .

[12]  R. Dunn Global Mapping of Ecosystem Disservices: The Unspoken Reality that Nature Sometimes Kills us , 2010 .

[13]  Paul J. Burgess,et al.  Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe , 2010 .

[14]  David A. Bohan,et al.  The environmental impacts of biomass crops: use by birds of miscanthus in summer and winter in southwestern England , 2010 .

[15]  Martha Grekos The Planning Act 2008 , 2010 .

[16]  Terry P. Dawson,et al.  A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[17]  J. Holden,et al.  Ecosystems Services in Dynamic and Contested Landscapes: The Case of UK Uplands , 2009 .

[18]  J. Holden,et al.  The future of the uplands , 2009 .

[19]  J. Whitaker,et al.  The impact of sustainable energy production on land use in Britain through to 2050 , 2009 .

[20]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  Land use and biodiversity relationships , 2009 .

[21]  Asha Rajvanshi,et al.  Biodiversity in Environmental Assessment: Enhancing Ecosystem Services for Human Well-Being , 2009 .

[22]  Paul Upham,et al.  Applying environmental-behaviour concepts to renewable energy siting controversy: Reflections on a longitudinal bioenergy case study , 2009 .

[23]  Alison R. Holt,et al.  Capitalizing on nature: how to implement an ecosystem approach , 2009, Biology Letters.

[24]  A. Faaij,et al.  The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting , 2009 .

[25]  P. Burgess,et al.  Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands , 2009 .

[26]  J.H.J. Spiertz,et al.  Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints , 2009 .

[27]  Gordon Purvis,et al.  Conceptual development of a harmonised method for tracking change and evaluating policy in the agri-environment: The Agri-environmental Footprint Index , 2009 .

[28]  David Miller,et al.  PUBLIC ATTITUDES AND PARTICIPATION IN WIND TURBINE DEVELOPMENT , 2009 .

[29]  Antoienette Wärnbäck,et al.  Cumulative effects in Swedish EIA practice — difficulties and obstacles , 2009 .

[30]  S. Hinsley,et al.  The impact of growing miscanthus for biomass on farmland bird populations , 2009 .

[31]  Matt Lobley,et al.  What is land for? : the food, fuel and climate change debate , 2009 .

[32]  G. Taylor,et al.  Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK , 2009 .

[33]  Gary Higgs,et al.  Using IT approaches to promote public participation in renewable energy planning: Prospects and challenges , 2008 .

[34]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[35]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Social enterprise and renewable energy: emerging initiatives and communities of practice , 2008 .

[36]  Brendan Fisher,et al.  Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multi-functional Wetlands , 2008 .

[37]  D. Moran,et al.  Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2008 .

[38]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[39]  S. Polasky,et al.  Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services , 2007 .

[40]  T. Kroeger,et al.  An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands , 2007 .

[41]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits , 2007 .

[42]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[43]  P. Burgess,et al.  Yield-SAFE: A parameter-sparse process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth and production in agroforestry systems , 2007 .

[44]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Biogas from Maize silage and from Manure: - for transport and for heat and power production under displacement of natural gas based heat works and marginal electricity in northern Germany , 2007 .

[45]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[46]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[47]  Pete Smith,et al.  The potential distribution of bioenergy crops in the UK under present and future climate , 2006 .

[48]  G. Stephan Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics , 2006 .

[49]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[50]  David Pearce What Constitutes a Good Agri-environmental Policy Evaluation? , 2005 .

[51]  D. Mcgillivray Restricting the Application of Eia for Agricultural Projects: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs V Alford , 2005 .

[52]  A. Kolhoff,et al.  A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA , 2003 .

[53]  A. McMichael,et al.  Ecosystems and Human well-being , 2003 .

[54]  J. Stoorvogel,et al.  The tradeoff analysis approach : lessons from Ecuador and Peru , 2003 .

[55]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[56]  Philip Jones,et al.  Integrating global and regional analyses of the effects of climate change: A case study of land use in England and Wales , 1996 .

[57]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate change 1995 - impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change : scientific-technical analyses , 1997 .

[58]  Atlantic Region,et al.  The Habitats Directive , 1995 .

[59]  P Tu,et al.  For sustainable development. , 1994, Integration.

[60]  E. N. Lawrence Clean Air Act , 1971, Nature.

[61]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.