Improved crashworthiness of rail passenger equipment in the United States

The Federal Railroad Administration has been conducting research to develop strategies for improved passenger protection in train accidents. Crash energy management (CEM) has been developed as a strategy for structural crashworthiness. Interior strategies that have been developed to work in concert with CEM include improved workstation tables and optimized commuter seats. The purpose of this research is to develop the technical information required for passenger equipment specifications, standards, and regulations. Research results are being applied by METROLINK commuter railroad in their current efforts to procure new equipment. The American Public Transportation Association is planning to develop industry standards from these research results. Alternative strategies for structural crashworthiness and occupant protection are first evaluated for potential effectiveness. For strategies that appear promising, designs are developed; test articles are built and then tested. The effectiveness studies define the crashworthiness design requirements; the design studies show what is feasible. The design studies result in drawings, which are used to build test articles. The construction of test articles requires that the designs be sound. The tests confirm the design performance; the test conditions are derived from the effectiveness studies; and the test results are used to refine the effectiveness studies. This research methodology results in the information required to develop specifications, standards, and regulations. For some collision conditions, CEM equipment can protect all of the occupants for closing speeds that are more than twice the speed for conventional equipment. Preserving the space for the occupants does marginally increase the deceleration of the CEM cab car. For trailing equipment, the decelerations are similar in CEM and conventional trains. The improved workstation table and optimized commuter passenger seat designs have been developed to mitigate the marginal increase in deceleration. The research on workstation tables has been carried out cooperatively with the United Kingdom’s Rail Safety and Standards Board. Crashworthiness can be incrementally improved by the strategic addition of CEM and occupant protection features. Full-scale impact tests have been arranged to allow direct comparison of the crashworthiness performance of conventional and alternative strategies. Single-car and two-car impact tests of conventional and CEM equipment have been conducted. These tests have shown that CEM can preserve the occupant volume and limit the likelihood of derailment. In these tests, the conventional equipment lost occupant volume and derailed. In the train-to-train tests, a cab car led train traveling at 30 mph impacts a standing locomotive led train. In the conventional equipment test, the space for 48 occupants was eliminated. The CEM equipment test is planned for March 23, 2006. It is expected that the space for all of the occupants will be preserved and that injury criteria values will remain within survivable limits. Instrumented test dummies in the cab and first coach cars will be used to confirm these expectations. What’s new? Conventional and CEM equipment can safely be used in the same trains and CEM equipment can be introduced on a car-by-car basis, rather than a train-by-train basis.

[1]  David Tyrell,et al.  SINGLE PASSENGER RAIL CAR IMPACT TEST. VOLUME 1: OVERVIEW AND SELECTED RESULTS , 2000 .

[2]  J. Zolock,et al.  Rail-car impact tests with steel coil: car crush , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference, 2003..

[3]  David Tyrell,et al.  Two-Car Impact Test of Crash-Energy Management Passenger Rail Cars: Analysis of Occupant Protection Measurements , 2004 .

[4]  Eloy Martinez,et al.  A Crush Zone Design for an Existing Passenger Rail Cab Car , 2005 .

[5]  D. Tyrell,et al.  Preparations for a train-to-train impact test of crash-energy management passenger rail equipment , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, 2005..

[6]  R. Stringfellow,et al.  Locomotive Crashworthiness Research , 1994 .

[7]  B. Perlman,et al.  Rail car impact tests with steel coil: collision dynamics , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference, 2003..

[8]  A. Benjamin Perlman,et al.  Evaluation of Rail Passenger Equipment Crashworthiness Strategies , 2003 .

[9]  Ronald A. Mayville,et al.  Rail vehicle cab car collision and corner post designs according to APTA-S-034 requirements , 2003 .

[10]  David C. Tyrell,et al.  US rail equipment crashworthiness standards , 2002 .

[11]  Ronald A. Mayville,et al.  Evaluation of cab car crashworthiness design modifications , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference.

[12]  A. Benjamin Perlman,et al.  Rail Passenger Equipment Crashworthiness Testing Requirements and Implementation , 2000, Rail Transportation.

[13]  John Zolock,et al.  PASSENGER RAIL TWO-CAR IMPACT TEST. VOLUME I: OVERVIEW AND SELECTED RESULTS , 2002 .

[14]  David C. Tyrell Passenger rail train-to-train impact test. Volume 1 : overview and selected results , 2003 .

[15]  David Tyrell,et al.  Impact Tests of Crash Energy Management Passenger Rail Cars: Analysis and Structural Measurements , 2004 .

[16]  David Tyrell,et al.  CRASHWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMUTER RAIL PASSENGER SEATS , 2005 .

[17]  David Tyrell,et al.  CRASHWORTHINESS OF PASSENGER TRAINS: SAFETY OF HIGH-SPEED GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[18]  Caroline VanIngen-Dunn,et al.  SINGLE PASSENGER RAIL CAR IMPACT TEST. VOLUME 2: SUMMARY OF OCCUPANT PROTECTION PROGRAM , 2000 .

[19]  K. Severson,et al.  Effectiveness of alternative rail passenger equipment crashworthiness strategies , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference.

[20]  Clifford Goodman,et al.  American Society of Mechanical Engineers , 1988 .

[21]  David Tyrell,et al.  Passenger rail equipment research in the U.S. , 2002 .

[22]  Eloy Martinez,et al.  Development of Crash Energy Management Designs for Existing Passenger Rail Vehicles , 2004 .

[23]  David Tyrell,et al.  Design of a Workstation Table With Improved Crashworthiness Performance , 2005 .

[24]  Ronald A. Mayville,et al.  LOCOMOTIVE CRASHWORTHINESS RESEARCH. FINAL REPORT. VOLUME 5: CAB CAR CRASHWORTHINESS REPORT , 1996 .

[25]  Ronald A. Mayville,et al.  A numerical evaluation of protection strategies for cab car crashworthiness , 1999 .

[26]  Ronald A. Mayville,et al.  Static and dynamic crush testing and analysis of a rail vehicle corner structural element , 1999 .

[27]  D. Tyrell,et al.  Impact test of a crash-energy management passenger rail car , 2004, ASME/IEEE Joint Rail Conference, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004.

[28]  C F Schulte,et al.  Consensus Rulemaking at the Federal Railroad Administration All Aboard for Railway Safety Measures , 2005 .

[29]  D. Tyrell,et al.  Overview of a crash energy management specification for passenger rail equipment , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference.

[30]  David Tyrell,et al.  Evaluating Abdominal Injury in Impacts with Workstation Tables , 2005 .

[31]  David Tyrell,et al.  Locomotive Cab Occupant Protection , 2003 .