A test of the design of a video tutorial for software training

The effectiveness of a video tutorial versus a paper-based tutorial for software training has yet to be established. Mixed outcomes from the empirical studies to date suggest that for a video tutorial to outperform its paper-based counterpart, the former should be crafted so that it addresses the strengths of both designs. This was attempted in the present study. Two consecutive experiments were conducted to examine the effect of tutorial type video vs. paper based on task relevance, self-efficacy, mood, flow and task performance. Participants were students from junior high school. Both studies reported significant, positive contributions of the tutorials to task relevance, self-efficacy, mood and flow. Both studies also found significant and substantial effects on task performance. A learning gain of about 30% was achieved in both studies. A retention task, completed only in Study 2, further revealed that the learning effect was stable. More importantly, performance on this task also indicated a significant interaction with tutorial type, favouring the video. The success of the video tutorial is ascribed to its design, which attended to and even incorporated key qualities of paper-based tutorials, while also capitalizing on the strengths of video.

[1]  Stephen J. Payne,et al.  Animated Demonstrations for Exploratory Learners , 1992, Interact. Comput..

[2]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  Are animated demonstrations the clearest and most comfortable way to communicate on-screen instructions? , 2008 .

[3]  R. Moreno.  Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods , 2007 .

[4]  Yuh-Tyng Chen,et al.  The effect of thematic video-based instruction on learning and motivation in e-learning , 2012 .

[5]  H. van der Meij.  Goal-Orientation, Goal-Setting, and Goal-Driven Behavior in Minimalist User Instructions , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[6]  Thomas A. DeVaney.  Impact of Video Tutorials in an Online Educational Statistics Course , 2009 .

[7]  George Palaigeorgiou,et al.  Journal of Information Technology Education Known and Unknown Weaknesses in Software Animated Demonstrations (screencasts): a Study in Self-paced Learning Settings , 2022 .

[8]  F. Paas,et al.  Interactivity in Video-based Models , 2007 .

[9]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[11]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Screencast Tutorials Enhance Student Learning of Statistics , 2012 .

[12]  D. Leutner,et al.  Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis , 2007 .

[13]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[14]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Eight guidelines for the design of instructional videos for software training , 2013 .

[15]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations vs Written Instructions for Learning Procedural Tasks: A Preliminary Investigation , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  G. Salomon.  Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. , 1984 .

[17]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Searching User-Controllable Animations During Learning , 2008 .

[18]  Patricia D. Mautone,et al.  Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. , 2003 .

[19]  C. W. Bowen,et al.  Teaching subcuticular suturing to medical students: video versus expert instructor feedback. , 2011, Journal of surgical education.

[20]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation , 1991 .

[21]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[22]  S. Derry,et al.  Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research , 2000 .

[23]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children’s opinions of technology , 2008, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[24]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Do Pedagogical Agents Enhance Software Training? , 2013, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Kara Poe Alexander.  The Usability of Print and Online Video Instructions , 2013 .

[27]  A. Renkl,et al.  How Effective are Instructional Explanations in Example-Based Learning? A Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[28]  Richard Walker,et al.  The development of technology enhanced learning: findings from a 2008 survey of UK higher education institutions , 2011, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[29]  L. Chan,et al.  Advantages of video trigger in problem-based learning , 2010, Medical teacher.

[30]  Huib K. Tabbers,et al.  Learner control in animated multimedia instructions , 2010 .

[31]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  The effect of animation on comprehension and interest , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[32]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[33]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Differential impact of unguided versus guided use of a multimedia introduction to equine obstetrics in veterinary education , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Pep Simo,et al.  Podcasting: A new technological tool to facilitate good practice in higher education , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Ba de Leng,et al.  How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem‐based medical education , 2007, Medical education.

[36]  J. Christopher Zimmer,et al.  Podcasting acceptance on campus: The differing perspectives of teachers and students , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[37]  H. VAN DER MEIJ,et al.  The four components of a procedure , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[38]  Iain Doherty,et al.  Enhancement of Medical Interns' Levels of Clinical Skills Competence and Self-Confidence Levels via Video iPods: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  Hans van der Meij,et al.  Designing for user cognition and affect in software instructions , 2008 .

[40]  Janet Palmer,et al.  Affective guidance of intelligent agents: How emotion controls cognition , 2009, Cognitive Systems Research.

[41]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Motivation and metacognition when learning a complex system , 1999 .

[42]  Regina Vollmeyer,et al.  Motivational Effects on Self-Regulated Learning with Different Tasks , 2006 .

[43]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Learning to Use a Home Medical Device: Mediating Age-Related Differences with Training , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[44]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations for Learning Procedural Computer-Based Tasks , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[45]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[46]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Learning from animation enabled by collaboration , 2010 .

[47]  Jason Swarts,et al.  New Modes of Help: Best Practices for Instructional Video , 2012 .

[48]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[49]  Jason Swarts,et al.  YouTutorial: A Framework for Assessing Instructional Online Video , 2012 .

[50]  Ehren Helmut Pflugfelder.  The Minimalist Approach to Online Instructional Videos , 2013 .

[51]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Using Animation to Help Students Learn Computer Algorithms , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[52]  George Palaigeorgiou,et al.  Students' Attitudes Towards Animated Demonstrations as Computer Learning Tools , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[53]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  Animated demonstrations and training wheels interfaces in a complex learning environment , 2008, Interact. Comput..