Compliance with the Disclosure Requirements of Germany's New Market: IAS Versus Us Gaap

This research examines compliance with both International Accounting Standards (IAS) and United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (US GAAP) for companies listed on Germany's New Market. Based on a sample of 100 firms that apply IAS and 100 that apply US GAAP, we investigate the extent to which companies comply with IAS and US GAAP disclosure requirements in their year-2000 financial statements. Compliance levels range from 100% to 41.6%, with an average of 83.7%. The average compliance level is significantly lower for companies that apply IAS as compared to companies applying US GAAP. This study provides the first systematic evidence regarding the enforcement of US GAAP outside the US, and accordingly not subject to Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) review. The results unveil a considerable extent of non-compliance. The overall level of compliance with IAS and US GAAP disclosures is positively related to firms being audited by Big 5 auditing firms and to cross-listings on US exchanges. Compliance is also associated with references to the use of International Standards of Auditing (ISA) or US GAAS in the audit opinion. The findings add to the growing concerns regarding the lack of effective supervision in the German capital market.

[1]  Alan R. Cerf,et al.  Corporate reporting and investment decisions , 1961 .

[2]  Kamal Naser,et al.  Firm-specific determinants of the comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong , 1995 .

[3]  Christian Leuz,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure , 1999 .

[4]  Araceli Mora,et al.  The Relationship Between the Comprehensiveness of Corporate Annual Reports and Firm Characteristics in Spain , 1994 .

[5]  C. Leuz,et al.  IAS Versus U.S. GAAP: Information Asymmetry–Based Evidence from Germany's New Market , 2003 .

[6]  G. McNally,et al.  Corporate Financial Reporting in New Zealand: An Analysis of User Preferences, Corporate Characteristics and Disclosure Practices for Discretionary Information , 1982 .

[7]  D. Street.  An Interview with Sir David Tweedie , 2002 .

[8]  C. Leuz.  IAS versus US GAAP: Information Asymmetry-Based Evidence from Germany's New Market , 2002 .

[9]  Terence Cooke,et al.  Disclosure in the Corporate Annual Reports of Swedish Companies , 1989 .

[10]  M. Glaum.  Bridging the GAAP: the Changing Attitude of German Managers towards Anglo‐American Accounting and Accounting Harmonization , 2000 .

[11]  Pascal Dumontier,et al.  Why Firms Comply Voluntarily with IAS: an Empirical Analysis with Swiss Data , 1998 .

[12]  T. E. Cook,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE IN THE ANNUAL REPORTS OF JAPANESE CORPORATIONS , 1991 .

[13]  Stephen L Taylor,et al.  DISCRETIONARY DISCLOSURE OF RESERVES BY OIL AND GAS COMPANIES: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[14]  S. Gray,et al.  Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures By U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations , 1995 .

[15]  Terence Cooke,et al.  The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing and Industry Type on Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Japanese Listed Corporations , 1992 .

[16]  Begoña Giner Inchausti.  The influence of company characteristics and accounting regulation on information disclosed by Spanish firms , 1997 .

[17]  Sidney J. Gray,et al.  International Capital Market Pressures and Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures by U.S. and U.K. Multinationals , 1995 .

[18]  S. Bryant,et al.  Disclosure Level and Compliance with IASs: A Comparison of Companies With and Without U.S. Listings and Filings , 2000 .