People or systems? To blame is human. The fix is to engineer.

Person-centered safety theories that place the burden of causality on human traits and actions have been largely dismissed in favor of systems-centered theories. Students and practitioners are now taught that accidents are caused by multiple factors and occur due to the complex interactions of numerous work system elements, human and non-human. Nevertheless, person-centered approaches to safety management still prevail. This paper explores the notion that attributing causality and blame to people persists because it is both a fundamental psychological tendency as well as an industry norm that remains strong in aviation, health care, and other industries. Consequences of that possibility are discussed and a case is made for continuing to invest in whole-system design and engineering solutions.

[1]  K. Shaver,et al.  On causality, responsibility, and self-blame: a theoretical note. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  S Stradling,et al.  Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction? , 1990, Ergonomics.

[3]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social cognition, 2nd ed. , 1991 .

[4]  Melvin L. Holcom,et al.  Employee accidents: Influences of personal characteristics, job characteristics, and substance use in jobs differing in accident potential , 1993 .

[5]  David M. DeJoy,et al.  Managing safety in the workplace: An attribution theory analysis and model , 1994 .

[6]  H. Hendrick Good Ergonomics Is Good Economics , 1996 .

[7]  D. Parker,et al.  Organizational controls and safety: The varieties of rule‐related behaviour , 1998 .

[8]  Rebecca Lawton,et al.  Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work , 1998 .

[9]  J. Reason Human error: models and management , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  D. Woods Perspectives on Human Error: Hindsight Biases and Local Rationality , 2000 .

[11]  S. Dekker Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  K. Henriksen,et al.  Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[13]  S. Geller Workplace SafetyWorkplace Safety A People-Based Safety The psychology of actively caring , 2003 .

[14]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Work-arounds, Make-work, and Kludges , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[15]  D. Sleet,et al.  Application of behavior-change theories and methods to injury prevention. , 2003, Epidemiologic reviews.

[16]  T. Brennan,et al.  Medical malpractice. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Martin G. Helander,et al.  A Guide to Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[18]  David M. DeJoy,et al.  Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety , 2005 .

[19]  E. Geller,et al.  Behavior-Based Safety and Occupational Risk Management , 2005, Behavior modification.

[20]  E. Loftus Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[21]  F. Blanchard-Fields,et al.  Do Beliefs and Attributional Complexity Influence Age Differences in the Correspondence Bias , 2006 .

[22]  B. Karsh,et al.  Protocol Violations during Medication Administration in Pediatrics , 2006 .

[23]  N. Chau,et al.  Determinants of accident proneness: a case-control study in railway workers. , 2006, Occupational medicine.

[24]  Mary R. Kwaan,et al.  Incidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[25]  B. Karsh,et al.  A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[26]  C. Vincent,et al.  Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[27]  R. Pohl,et al.  HINDSIGHT BIAS: ON BEING WISE AFTER THE EVENT , 2007 .

[28]  B. Malle,et al.  Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Regulatory Styles and Their Consequences for Safety , 2008 .

[30]  Chris W Clegg,et al.  Assessing the value of human factors initiatives. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[31]  D. Parker,et al.  Identifying violation-provoking conditions in a healthcare setting , 2008, Ergonomics.

[32]  Manuel Tostain,et al.  Rational model and justification model in ‘outcome bias’ , 2008 .

[33]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find - The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals , 2009 .

[34]  M. D. Cooper Behavioral Safety Interventions A review of process design factors , 2009 .