Distance and shape: perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish.

Weakly electric fish orient at night in complete darkness by employing their active electrolocation system. They emit short electric signals and perceive the consequences of these emissions with epidermal electroreceptors. Objects are detected by analyzing the electric images which they project onto the animal's electroreceptive skin surface. This process corresponds to similar processes during vision, where visual images are cast onto the retinas of eyes. Behavioral experiments have shown that electric fish can measure the distance of objects during active electrolocation, thus possessing three-dimensional depth perception of their surroundings. The fundamental mechanism for distance determination differs from stereopsis used during vision by two-eyed animals, but resembles some supplementary mechanisms for distance deduction in humans. Weakly electric fish can also perceive the three-dimensional shape of objects. The fish can learn to identify certain objects and discriminate them from all other objects. In addition, they spontaneously categorize objects according to their shapes and not according to object size or material properties. There is good evidence that some fundamental types of perceptional invariances during visual object recognition in humans are also found in electric fish during active electrolocation. These include size invariance (maybe including size constancy), rotational invariance, and translational invariance. The mechanisms of shape detection during electrolocation are still unknown, and their discoveries require additional experiments.

[1]  Hermann Wagner,et al.  Stereoscopic depth perception in the owl , 1998, Neuroreport.

[2]  M. Lehrer,et al.  Object detection by honeybees: Why do they land on edges? , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  G. Emde,et al.  How the electric fish brain controls the production and analysis of electric signals during active electrolocation , 2001 .

[4]  L L Kontsevich,et al.  Defaults in stereoscopic and kinetic depth perception , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  C. Bell,et al.  Active Electrolocation and Its Neural Processing in Mormyrid Electric Fishes , 2003 .

[6]  Keith R. Laws,et al.  Object Recognition without Knowledge of Object Orientation , 1995, Cortex.

[7]  Peter Moller,et al.  Notes on ethology and ecology of the Swashi River mormyrids (Lake Kainji, Nigeria) , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[9]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[10]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Perception of electric properties of objects in electrolocating weakly electric fish: two-dimensional similarity scaling reveals a City-Block metric , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The effects of simple objects on the electric field of Apteronotus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  T. Collett Stereopsis in toads , 1977, Nature.

[13]  Harold H. Zakon,et al.  The Electroreceptors: Diversity in Structure and Function , 1988 .

[14]  C. Bell,et al.  The electric image in weakly electric fish: physical images of resistive objects in Gnathonemus petersii. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  Marian Stamp Dawkins,et al.  Pattern recognition and active vision in chickens , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Ruben Budelli,et al.  Electric fish measure distance in the dark , 1998, Nature.

[17]  I. Biederman,et al.  Evidence for Complete Translational and Reflectional Invariance in Visual Object Priming , 1991, Perception.

[18]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Motion cues provide the bee's visual world with a third dimension , 1988, Nature.

[19]  L. F. Kromer,et al.  Object recognition memory in the rat: the role of the hippocampus , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  J. Roy,et al.  Large scale stereopsis and optic flow: Depth enhanced by speed and opponent-motion , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[22]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Electrolocation of objects in the electric fishEigenmannia (Rhamphichthyidae, Gymnotoidei) , 1973, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  K. Kral,et al.  VISUAL DISTANCE DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN STATIONARY TARGETS IN PRAYING MANTIS : AN INDEX OF THE USE OF MOTION PARALLAX , 1995 .

[24]  LINDESAY HARKNESS,et al.  Chameleons use accommodation cues to judge distance , 1977, Nature.

[25]  Peter Moller,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of the weakly discharging electric fish Gnathonemus petersi using its electric organ discharges as the response measure , 1997 .

[26]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth , 1998, Nature.

[27]  Brian Timney,et al.  Local and global stereopsis in the horse , 1999, Vision Research.

[28]  K. Grant,et al.  Physiology and Plasticity of Morphologically Identified Cells in the Mormyrid Electrosensory Lobe , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Distance discrimination during active electrolocation in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  David R Moore,et al.  Auditory perception: The near and far of sound localization , 1999, Current Biology.

[31]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  The neural coding of stereoscopic depth. , 1997, Neuroreport.

[32]  G. Mather The Use of Image Blur as a Depth Cue , 1997, Perception.

[33]  Herman P. Schwan,et al.  CHAPTER 6 – DETERMINATION OF BIOLOGICAL IMPEDANCES1 , 1963 .

[34]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[35]  K Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. , 1993, Science.

[36]  J. Blauert Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .

[37]  P. Moller Electric fishes : history and behavior , 1995 .

[38]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[39]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurement in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[41]  R Sekuler,et al.  Blur and Contrast as Pictorial Depth Cues , 1997, Perception.

[42]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[43]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Binocular Vision and Stereopsis , 1996 .

[44]  A H Bass,et al.  Temporal coding of species recognition signals in an electric fish. , 1981, Science.

[45]  L Maler,et al.  Blurring of the senses: common cues for distance perception in diverse sensory systems , 2002, Neuroscience.