Integrating reverse osmosis and forward osmosis (RO-FO) for printing and dyeing wastewater treatment: impact of FO on water recovery

Reverse osmosis (RO) alone has low water recovery efficiency because of membrane fouling and limited operating pressure. In this study, a combined reverse osmosis-forward osmosis (RO-FO) process was used for the first time to improve the water recovery efficiency of secondary effluent in printing and dyeing wastewater. The effects of operating pressure and pH on water recovery and removal efficiency of RO-FO were investigated. The results showed that the optimum conditions were an operating pressure of 1.5 MPa and a feed solution pH of 9.0. Under optimal operating conditions, most of the organic and inorganic substances in the wastewater can be removed, and the rejection of total organic carbon (TOC), Sb, Ca, and K were 98.7, 99.3, 97.0, and 92.7%, respectively. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrices coupled with parallel factor (EEM-PARAFAC) analysis indicated that two components (tryptophan and tyrosine) in the influent were effectively rejected by the hybrid process. The maximum water recovery (Rw, max) could reach 95%, which was higher than the current single RO process (75%). This research provided a feasible strategy to effectively recover water from printing and dyeing wastewater.

[1]  Liang Ying Ee,et al.  A Review on Electrospinning as Versatile Supports for Diverse Nanofibers and Their Applications in Environmental Sensing , 2022, Advanced Fiber Materials.

[2]  Argyris Panagopoulos,et al.  Comparative techno-economic and environmental analysis of minimal liquid discharge (MLD) and zero liquid discharge (ZLD) desalination systems for seawater brine treatment and valorization , 2022, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments.

[3]  Argyris Panagopoulos,et al.  Decarbonized and circular brine management/valorization for water & valuable resource recovery via minimal/zero liquid discharge (MLD/ZLD) strategies. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Argyris Panagopoulos.  Process simulation and analysis of high‐pressure reverse osmosis (HPRO) in the treatment and utilization of desalination brine (saline wastewater) , 2022, International Journal of Energy Research.

[5]  Liang Ying Ee,et al.  Research progress in external field intensification of forward osmosis process for water treatment: A critical review. , 2022, Water research.

[6]  Argyris Panagopoulos.  Techno-economic assessment and feasibility study of a Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) desalination hybrid system in the Eastern Mediterranean , 2022, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification.

[7]  Jialing Song,et al.  Robust mitigation of FO membrane fouling by coagulation-floatation process: Role of microbubbles , 2022, Desalination.

[8]  Argyris Panagopoulos.  Brine management (saline water & wastewater effluents): Sustainable utilization and resource recovery strategy through Minimal and Zero Liquid Discharge (MLD & ZLD) desalination systems , 2022, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification.

[9]  Zhuo Chen,et al.  Performance of different pretreatment methods on alleviating reverse osmosis membrane fouling caused by soluble microbial products , 2022, Journal of Membrane Science.

[10]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Design principles and challenges of bench-scale high-pressure reverse osmosis up to 150 bar , 2021 .

[11]  Yong-Qiang Liu,et al.  Fouling and cleaning of thin film composite forward osmosis membrane treating municipal wastewater for resource recovery. , 2021, Chemosphere.

[12]  W. Lau,et al.  Probing and relating the morphology, structure and performance evolution of low pressure RO membranes under chlorine exposure , 2021 .

[13]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of Energy Consumption of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis and Low-Salt-Rejection Reverse Osmosis for Brine Management. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  S. Tseng,et al.  Evaluation of the benefit of practically operating reverse osmosis system in the factory: taking the recycling of KI solution and water of the screen polarizing plate as an example , 2021, Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination.

[15]  Hong-Ying Hu,et al.  Aggravated biofouling caused by chlorine disinfection in a pilot-scale reverse osmosis treatment system of municipal wastewater , 2021 .

[16]  Bo Yang,et al.  Separation, anti-fouling, and chlorine resistance of the polyamide reverse osmosis membrane: From mechanisms to mitigation strategies. , 2021, Water research.

[17]  F. Chen,et al.  Microcoagulation improved the performance of the UF–RO system treating the effluent from a coastal municipal wastewater treatment plant: a pilot-scale study , 2021, Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination.

[18]  Manhong Huang,et al.  Simultaneous robust removal of tetracycline and tetracycline resistance genes by a novel UiO/TPU/PSF forward osmosis membrane , 2020 .

[19]  M. Elimelech,et al.  High performance polyester reverse osmosis desalination membrane with chlorine resistance , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[20]  D. M. Davenport,et al.  Thin film composite membrane compaction in high-pressure reverse osmosis , 2020 .

[21]  Jiawei Wang,et al.  Efficient organic enrichment from sludge filtrate via a forward osmosis membrane process , 2020 .

[22]  Manhong Huang,et al.  Rejection of antimony in dyeing and printing wastewater by forward osmosis. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Xinhua Xu,et al.  Calcium carbonate scaling in forward osmosis for textile reverse osmosis concentrate treatment , 2020, Journal of Water Process Engineering.

[24]  David Wallerstein.  Food-energy-water (FEW) nexus: Rearchitecting the planet to accommodate 10 billion humans by 2050 , 2020 .

[25]  M. Loizidou,et al.  Desalination brine disposal methods and treatment technologies - A review. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Minimal and zero liquid discharge with reverse osmosis using low-salt-rejection membranes. , 2019, Water research.

[27]  Zhiqiang Hu,et al.  Forward osmosis with an algal draw solution to concentrate municipal wastewater and recover resources , 2019, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[28]  I. Koc,et al.  Performance of a pilot-scale reverse osmosis process for water recovery from biologically-treated textile wastewater. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  O. Cherkaoui,et al.  Textile finishing dyes and their impact on aquatic environs , 2019, Heliyon.

[30]  Md. Shahidul Islam,et al.  Photocatalytic activity improvement and application of UV-TiO2 photocatalysis in textile wastewater treatment: A review , 2019, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering.

[31]  Q. Xiang,et al.  Innovative Treatment of Organic Contaminants in Reverse Osmosis Concentrate from Water Reuse: a Mini Review , 2019, Current Pollution Reports.

[32]  Haiou Huang,et al.  Dependence of initial silica scaling on the surface physicochemical properties of reverse osmosis membranes during bench-scale brackish water desalination. , 2019, Water research.

[33]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Concentration and Recovery of Dyes from Textile Wastewater Using a Self-Standing, Support-Free Forward Osmosis Membrane. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  N. Hilal,et al.  Reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies and future trends: A comprehensive review , 2019, Desalination.

[35]  Rajesha Kumar,et al.  Assessment of Performance of Inorganic Draw Solutions Tested in Forward Osmosis Process for Desalinating Arabian Gulf Seawater , 2018, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering.

[36]  Fang Li,et al.  Direct contact membrane distillation for the treatment of industrial dyeing wastewater and characteristic pollutants , 2018 .

[37]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Unlocking High-Salinity Desalination with Cascading Osmotically Mediated Reverse Osmosis: Energy and Operating Pressure Analysis. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Rejection of heavy metals in acidic wastewater by a novel thin-film inorganic forward osmosis membrane , 2017 .

[39]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Relating Silica Scaling in Reverse Osmosis to Membrane Surface Properties. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  Zhiwei Zhao,et al.  Membrane fouling of forward osmosis (FO) membrane for municipal wastewater treatment: A comparison between direct FO and OMBR. , 2016, Water research.

[41]  A. Pandit,et al.  A critical review on textile wastewater treatments: Possible approaches. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[42]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Factors governing the pre-concentration of wastewater using forward osmosis for subsequent resource recovery. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  H. Shon,et al.  Role of various physical and chemical techniques for hollow fibre forward osmosis membrane cleaning , 2016 .

[44]  Yuexi Zhou,et al.  Treatment of reverse osmosis (RO) concentrate by the combined Fe/Cu/air and Fenton process (1stFe/Cu/air-Fenton-2ndFe/Cu/air). , 2016, Journal of hazardous materials.

[45]  S. Vigneswaran,et al.  Forward osmosis treatment for volume minimisation of reverse osmosis concentrate from a water reclamation plant and removal of organic micropollutants , 2015 .

[46]  Guanglei Qiu,et al.  Direct and complete phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater using a hybrid microfiltration-forward osmosis membrane bioreactor process with seawater brine as draw solution. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  R. Snyder,et al.  Water Scarcity and Future Challenges for Food Production , 2015 .

[48]  Manhong Huang,et al.  Comparison of tetracycline rejection in reclaimed water by three kinds of forward osmosis membranes , 2015 .

[49]  L. Fan,et al.  Effect of coagulation on treatment of municipal wastewater reverse osmosis concentrate by UVC/H2O2. , 2014, Journal of hazardous materials.

[50]  Z. Cai,et al.  Application of sodium oxalate in the dyeing of cotton fabric with reactive red 3BS , 2014 .

[51]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Toward Resource Recovery from Wastewater: Extraction of Phosphorus from Digested Sludge Using a Hybrid Forward Osmosis–Membrane Distillation Process , 2014 .

[52]  Kerri L. Hickenbottom,et al.  Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations , 2013 .

[53]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[54]  W. Gernjak,et al.  Monitoring reverse osmosis performance: Conductivity versus fluorescence excitation–emission matrix (EEM) , 2013 .

[55]  Derya Y. Koseoglu-Imer,et al.  Pilot-scale evaluation of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for process reuse of segregated textile dyewash wastewater , 2012 .

[56]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: Role of solution pH and membrane orientation , 2012 .

[57]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  A comparative life cycle assessment of hybrid osmotic dilution desalination and established seawater desalination and wastewater reclamation processes. , 2012, Water research.

[58]  C. D. Lundin,et al.  A multi-barrier osmotic dilution process for simultaneous desalination and purification of impaired water , 2010 .

[59]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[60]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation , 2009 .

[61]  T. Ternes,et al.  Ozonation of reverse osmosis concentrate: kinetics and efficiency of beta blocker oxidation. , 2008, Water research.

[62]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[63]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of humic acid fouled reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by transmission electron microscopy and streaming potential measurements. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[64]  R. Y. Ning,et al.  Recovery optimization of RO concentrate from desert wells , 2006 .

[65]  Berrin Tansel,et al.  Significance of hydrated radius and hydration shells on ionic permeability during nanofiltration in dead end and cross flow modes , 2006 .

[66]  Gary Amy,et al.  Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  J. Schwaiger,et al.  Toxic effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac. Part I: histopathological alterations and bioaccumulation in rainbow trout. , 2004, Aquatic toxicology.

[68]  K. Booksh,et al.  Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[69]  Laura Chekli,et al.  A comprehensive review of hybrid forward osmosis systems , 2016 .

[70]  Puspendu Bhunia,et al.  A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[71]  P. Coble.  Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy , 1996 .