Preliminary study on the effects of exclusion of wild fauna from aquaculture cages in a shallow marine environment

Abstract Previous investigations into the environmental impacts at a shallow-water oligotrophic marine experimental cage aquaculture site in Western Australia have found no accumulation of organic material, and limited changes in macrofaunal communities. It was hypothesised that wild fish populations in the area consumed particulate wastes emanating from the cage, thus reducing the benthic impacts. An experiment was designed to quantify the accumulation of organic material on the seabed occurring in the presence and absence of wild fauna. Three treatments were arranged in duplicate, cages without exclusion nets (normal situation) (CAGE-FISH); cages surrounded by a 35-mm mesh exclusion net (preventing wild fish access to the sea bed and water column near the cage) (CAGE-FISH-EXCL); and empty cages surrounded by exclusion nets (to control for effects from the exclusion net) (CAGE-EXCL). In addition, four reference sites without cages (REF) were sampled. Following baseline sampling, rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) were stocked into the CAGE-FISH and the CAGE-FISH-EXCL treatments at an initial stocking density of 2.4 kg m −3 . The experiment was terminated after 62 days, at a final stock density of 5.6 kg m −3 . Sampling found significantly greater accumulation of nutrients and fine sediments under the cages enclosed in the exclusion net than in other treatments and sites. Levels of organic carbon deposition at cages with exclusion nets was found to be 4.5±1.0 g C m −2 day −1 (mean±S.E.) compared to 0.7 to 1.1 g C m −2 day −1 at control and reference sites. The accumulation of nutrients at the CAGE-FISH-EXCL sites was correlated to distinct changes in macrofaunal community composition, with a sharp increase in overall macrofaunal abundance and a growing dominance of capitellid polychaetes. Based on a comparison between sedimentation rates within and outside excluded areas, the proportions of the total sedimenting nutrients consumed by wild fish were calculated to be 40% to 60%. It was concluded that in the natural coastal system of Western Australia or comparable environments, wild fish are potential important consumers of cage aquaculture waste materials. The fact that sediment C, N and P did not increase below cages with fish and no exclusion nets suggests that the benthic fauna, including surface grazing fish, at these sites were able to assimilate much of the remaining total sedimentary nutrients.

[1]  R. Gowen,et al.  Modelling benthic deposition under fish cages , 1996 .

[2]  Subcommittee on Poultry Nutrition Nutrient Requirements of Fish , 1993 .

[3]  I. H. Rorison,et al.  Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. , 1974 .

[4]  E. Sala The role of fishes in the organization of a Mediterranean sublittoral community , 1997 .

[5]  D. Carss,et al.  Concentrations of wild and escaped fishes immediately adjacent to fish farm cages , 1990 .

[6]  Ioannis Karakassis,et al.  Benthic disturbance due to fish farming analyzed under different levels of taxonomic resolution , 2000 .

[7]  C. Macleod,et al.  Video assessment of environmental impacts of salmon farms , 2001 .

[8]  Malcolm Beveridge,et al.  Settling rate characteristics and nutrient content of the faeces of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and the implications for modelling of solid waste dispersion , 1999 .

[9]  C. Braak Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient Analysis , 1986 .

[10]  M. Keough,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in the effects of fish predation on macrofauna in relation to habitat complexity and cage effects , 2001 .

[11]  B. Hargrave,et al.  Cost-effective monitoring of organic enrichment resulting from salmon mariculture , 2001 .

[12]  R. Warwick The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities , 1988 .

[13]  G. Warner,et al.  Effects of caging on the development of a sessile epifaunal community , 1984 .

[14]  K. Black,et al.  Biology of farmed fish. , 1998 .

[15]  E. Sala The role of fishes in the organization of a Mediterranean sublittoral community: II: Epifaunal communities , 1997 .

[16]  Robert L. Folk,et al.  Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks , 1974 .

[17]  C. J. Shepherd,et al.  Intensive Fish Farming , 1992 .

[18]  M. Steele Effects of predators on reef fishes: separating cage artifacts from effects of predation , 1996 .

[19]  L. Robaina,et al.  A comparative study of sediments under a marine cage farm at Gran Canaria Island (Spain). Preliminary results , 2001 .

[20]  Les Watling,et al.  Environmental impact of salmon net-pen culture on marine benthic communities in Maine: A case study , 1995 .

[21]  R. Cole,et al.  Predicting impacts and recovery of marine-farm sites in Stewart Island, New Zealand, from the Findlay-Watling model , 2000 .

[22]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment , 1978 .

[23]  O Holby,et al.  Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm IV. Nitrogen , 1990 .

[24]  M. Surtida,et al.  Sustainability in aquaculture , 1998 .

[25]  C. Crawford,et al.  The degradation of fish-cage waste in sediments during fallowing , 2000 .

[26]  M. Huston A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[27]  Dominique P. Bureau,et al.  Development of bioenergetic models and the Fish-PrFEQ software to estimate production, feeding ration and waste output in aquaculture , 1998 .

[28]  R. Mccance,et al.  Nutrition and growth , 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[29]  S. Wakeham,et al.  Effectiveness of various treatments in retarding microbial activity in sediment trap material and their effects on the collection of swimmers , 1992 .

[30]  M. Phillips The attraction of free ranging rainbow trout to a feeding station , 1983 .

[31]  M. Beveridge,et al.  Physical Characteristics of Commercial Pelleted Atlantic Salmon Feeds and Consideration of Implications for Modeling of Waste Dispersion through Sedimentation , 1999, Aquaculture International.

[32]  M. Tsapakis,et al.  Impact of cage farming of fish on the seabed in three Mediterranean coastal areas , 2000 .

[33]  J. R. Brown,et al.  The effect of salmon farming on the benthos of a Scottish sea loch , 1987 .

[34]  M. Beveridge Cage and pen fish farming. Carrying capacity models and environmental impact , 1984 .

[35]  Mark John Costello,et al.  Environmental conditions at sea-cages, and ectoparasites on farmed European sea-bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (L.), and gilt-head sea-bream, Sparus aurata L., at two farms in Greece , 1996 .

[36]  Chris J Cromey,et al.  DEPOMOD—modelling the deposition and biological effects of waste solids from marine cage farms , 2002 .

[37]  S. Kennelly Caging experiments to examine the effects of fishes on understorey species in a sublittoral kelp community , 1991 .

[38]  H. Grimshaw The determination of total phosphorus in soils by acid digestion , 1987 .

[39]  V. Pasqualini,et al.  Preliminary data on the impact of fish farming facilities on Posidonia oceanica meadows in the Mediterranean , 1999 .

[40]  T. Pearson,et al.  The environmental impacts of marine fish cage culture. , 2000 .

[41]  P. Levin,et al.  Interactive effects of habitat selection, food supply and predation on recruitment of an estuarine fish , 1997, Oecologia.

[42]  T. Johansson,et al.  Direct flows of phosphorus and suspended matter from a fish farm to wild fish in Lake Southern Bullaren, Sweden , 1998 .