Improved resolution 3D object reconstruction using computational integral imaging with time multiplexing.

In the computational three-dimensional (3D) volumetric reconstruction integral imaging (II) system, volume pixels of the scene are reconstructed by superimposing the inversely mapped elemental images through a computationally simulated optical reconstruction process according to ray optics. Close placement of a 3D object to the lenslet array in the pickup process may result in significant variation in intensity between the adjacent pixels of the reconstructed image, degrading the quality of the image. The intensity differences result from the different number of the superimposed elemental images used for reconstructing the corresponding pixels. In this paper, we propose improvements of the reconstructed image quality in two ways using 1) normalized computational 3D volumetric reconstruction II, and 2) hybrid moving lenslet array technique (MALT). To reduce the intensity irregularities between the pixels, we normalize the intensities of the reconstructed image pixels by the overlapping numbers of the inversely mapped elemental images. To capture the elemental image sets for the MALT process, a stationary 3D object pickup process is performed repeatedly at various locations of the pickup lenslet array's focal plane, which is perpendicular to the optical axis. With MALT, we are able to enhance the quality of the reconstructed images by increasing the sampling rate. We present experimental results of volume pixel reconstruction to test and verify the performance of the proposed reconstruction algorithm. We have shown that substantial improvement in the visual quality of the 3D reconstruction is obtained using the proposed technique.

[1]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Digital three-dimensional image correlation by use of computer-reconstructed integral imaging. , 2002, Applied optics.

[2]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Three-dimensional image sensing and reconstruction with time-division multiplexed computational integral imaging. , 2003, Applied optics.

[3]  Amparo Pons,et al.  Axial apodization in 4Pi-confocal microscopy by annular binary filters. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  F. Okano,et al.  Gradient-index lens-array method based on real-time integral photography for three-dimensional images. , 1998, Applied optics.

[5]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Three-dimensional volumetric object reconstruction using computational integral imaging. , 2004, Optics express.

[6]  F. Okano,et al.  Analysis of resolution limitation of integral photography , 1998 .

[7]  C. Burckhardt Optimum Parameters and Resolution Limitation of Integral Photography , 1968 .

[8]  V. Perez-Mendez,et al.  Axial Tomography and Three Dimensional Image Reconstruction , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Improved Tomographic Reconstruction in Seven-Pinhole Imaging , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  D J Brady,et al.  Three-dimensional source reconstruction with a scanned pinhole camera. , 1998, Optics letters.

[11]  T. Okoshi Optimum design and depth resolution of lens-sheet and projection-type three-dimensional displays. , 1971, Applied optics.

[12]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Formation of orthoscopic three-dimensional real images in direct pickup one-step integral imaging , 2003 .

[13]  Bahram Javidi,et al.  Improved viewing resolution of three-dimensional integral imaging by use of nonstationary micro-optics. , 2002, Optics letters.

[14]  Malcolm McCormick,et al.  Design and analysis of an image transfer system using microlens arrays , 1994 .

[15]  Herbert E. Ives,et al.  Optical Properties of a Lippmann Lenticulated Sheet , 1931 .

[16]  D H McMahon,et al.  A technique for producing wide-angle holographic displays. , 1970, Applied optics.