Multiangular Observation of Canopy Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence by Combining Imaging Spectroscopy and Stereoscopy

The effect that the canopy structure and the viewing geometry have on the intensity and the spatial distribution of passively measured sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence at canopy scale is still not well understood. These uncertainties constrain the potential use of fluorescence to quantify photosynthesis at this level. Using a novel technique, we evaluated the diurnal changes in the spatial distribution of sun-induced fluorescence at 760 nm (F760) within the canopy as a consequence of the spatial disposition of the leaves and the viewing angle of the sensor. High resolution spectral and stereo images of a full sugar beet canopy were recorded simultaneously in the field to estimate maps of F760 and the surface angle distribution, respectively. A dedicated algorithm was used to align both maps in the post-processing and its accuracy was evaluated using a sensitivity test. The relative angle between sun and the leaf surfaces primarily determined the amount of incident Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR), which in turn was reflected in different values of F760, with the highest values occurring in leaf surfaces that are perpendicularly oriented to the sun. The viewing angle of the sensor also had an impact in the intensity of the recorded F760. Higher viewing angles generally resulted in higher values of F760. We attribute these changes to a direct effect of the vegetation directional reflectance response on fluorescence retrieval. Consequently, at leaf surface level, the spatio-temporal variations of F760 were mainly explained by the sun–leaf–sensor geometry rather than directionality of the fluorescence emission. At canopy scale, the diurnal patterns of F760 observed on the top-of-canopy were attributed to the complex interplay between the light penetration into the canopy as a function of the display of the various leaves and the fluorescence emission of each leaf which is modulated by the exposure of the individual leaf patch to the incoming light and the functional status of photosynthesis. We expect that forward modeling can help derive analytical simplified skeleton assumptions to scale canopy measurements to the leaf functional properties.

[1]  R. Colombo,et al.  Red and far red Sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence as a measure of plant photosynthesis , 2015 .

[2]  R. Samson,et al.  Bidirectional sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence emission is influenced by leaf structure and light scattering properties — A bottom-up approach , 2015 .

[3]  D. Kimes,et al.  Irradiance measurement errors due to the assumption of a Lambertian reference panel , 1982 .

[4]  Detlef Ehlert,et al.  Assessment of a laser scanner on agricultural machinery. , 2010 .

[5]  W. Verhoef,et al.  Impact of varying irradiance on vegetation indices and chlorophyll fluorescence derived from spectroscopy data , 2015 .

[6]  Michele Meroni,et al.  Assessing Steady-state Fluorescence and PRI from Hyperspectral Proximal Sensing as Early Indicators of Plant Stress: The Case of Ozone Exposure , 2008, Sensors.

[7]  J. Calpe,et al.  Evaluation of remote sensing of vegetation fluorescence by the analysis of diurnal cycles , 2008 .

[8]  K. Torrance,et al.  Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces , 1967 .

[9]  W. Verhoef,et al.  An integrated model of soil-canopy spectral radiances, photosynthesis, fluorescence, temperature and energy balance , 2009 .

[10]  Ladislav Nedbal,et al.  Computer Reconstruction of Plant Growth and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Emission in Three Spatial Dimensions , 2012, Sensors.

[11]  Hermann Kaufmann,et al.  On the application of the MODTRAN4 atmospheric radiative transfer code to optical remote sensing , 2009 .

[12]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements , 2012 .

[13]  Darius Burschka,et al.  Advances in Computational Stereo , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[14]  J. Flexas,et al.  Steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence (Fs) measurements as a tool to follow variations of net CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance during water-stress in C3 plants. , 2002, Physiologia plantarum.

[15]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  Effects of canopy architectural parameterizations on the modeling of radiative transfer mechanism , 2013 .

[16]  R. Colombo,et al.  Sun‐induced fluorescence – a new probe of photosynthesis: First maps from the imaging spectrometer HyPlant , 2015, Global change biology.

[17]  Lawrence A. Corp,et al.  Comparison of measurements and FluorMOD simulations for solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence and reflectance of a corn crop under nitrogen treatments , 2008 .

[18]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  A coupled 1-D atmosphere and 3-D canopy radiative transfer model for canopy reflectance, light environment, and photosynthesis simulation in a heterogeneous landscape , 2008 .

[19]  M. Rossini,et al.  Continuous and long-term measurements of reflectance and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence by using novel automated field spectroscopy systems , 2015 .

[20]  Uwe Rascher,et al.  Combining Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photochemical Reflectance Index Improves Diurnal Modeling of Gross Primary Productivity , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Hanno Scharr,et al.  Quantification of Plant Surface Structures form Small Baseline Stereo Images to Measure the Three-dimensional Surface from the Leaf to the Canopy Scale , 2009 .

[22]  M. Rossini,et al.  High resolution field spectroscopy measurements for estimating gross ecosystem production in a rice field , 2010 .

[23]  G LoweDavid,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004 .

[24]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Improved Fraunhofer Line Discrimination Method for Vegetation Fluorescence Quantification , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[25]  Albert Olioso,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Canopy Level Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence During the Growth of a Sorghum Field , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Jan Vanderborght,et al.  Monitoring and Modeling the Terrestrial System from Pores to Catchments: The Transregional Collaborative Research Center on Patterns in the Soil–Vegetation–Atmosphere System , 2015 .

[27]  Wout Verhoef,et al.  A model for chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis at leaf scale , 2009 .

[28]  David Doxaran,et al.  Use of a Spectralon panel to measure the downwelling irradiance signal: case studies and recommendations. , 2004, Applied optics.

[29]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2 , 2013 .

[30]  L. Gómez-Chova,et al.  Developments for vegetation fluorescence retrieval from spaceborne high‐resolution spectrometry in the O2‐A and O2‐B absorption bands , 2010 .

[31]  M. Rossini,et al.  Characterization of fine resolution field spectrometers using solar Fraunhofer lines and atmospheric absorption features. , 2010, Applied optics.

[32]  F. Franck,et al.  Resolution of the Photosystem I and Photosystem II contributions to chlorophyll fluorescence of intact leaves at room temperature. , 2002, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[33]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Study of the diurnal cycle of stressed vegetation for the improvement of fluorescence remote sensing , 2006, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[35]  S. W. Maier,et al.  Sun-induced fluorescence: A new tool for precision farming , 2003 .

[36]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Spatial Resolution Effects on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Retrieval in a Heterogeneous Canopy Using Hyperspectral Imagery and Radiative Transfer Simulation , 2013, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[37]  J. Flexas,et al.  Steady-State and Maximum Chlorophyll Fluorescence Responses to Water Stress in Grapevine Leaves: A New Remote Sensing System , 2000 .

[38]  S. Jacquemoud,et al.  Leaf BRDF measurements and model for specular and diffuse components differentiation , 2005 .

[39]  C. Panigada,et al.  Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from high-resolution imaging spectroscopy data to quantify spatio-temporal patterns of photosynthetic function in crop canopies. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[40]  Z. Malenovský,et al.  Scientific and technical challenges in remote sensing of plant canopy reflectance and fluorescence. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[41]  M. Schaepman,et al.  FLD-based retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from medium spectral resolution airborne spectroscopy data , 2014 .

[42]  Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler,et al.  The Role of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in The Detection of Stress Conditions in Plants , 1988 .

[43]  I. Moyaa,et al.  A new instrument for passive remote sensing 1 . Measurements of sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2004 .

[44]  C. Buschmann Variability and application of the chlorophyll fluorescence emission ratio red/far-red of leaves , 2007, Photosynthesis Research.

[45]  Luis Alonso,et al.  Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence: Review of methods and applications , 2009 .

[46]  H. Scharr,et al.  The leaf angle distribution of natural plant populations: assessing the canopy with a novel software tool , 2015, Plant Methods.

[47]  Luis Guanter Palomar New algorithms for atmospheric correction and retrieval of biophysical parameters in earth observation. Application to ENVISAT/MERIS data , 2007 .

[48]  J. A. Plascyk The MK II Fraunhofer Line Discriminator (FLD-II) for Airborne and Orbital Remote Sensing of Solar-Stimulated Luminescence , 1975 .

[49]  H. Scharr,et al.  A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[50]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Spatio-temporal patterns of chlorophyll fluorescence and physiological and structural indices acquired from hyperspectral imagery as compared with carbon fluxes measured with eddy covariance , 2013 .

[51]  G. Krause,et al.  Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis: The Basics , 1991 .

[52]  Ismael Moya,et al.  Effect of canopy structure on sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2012 .

[53]  Uwe Rascher,et al.  Dynamics of photosynthesis in fluctuating light. , 2006, Current opinion in plant biology.

[54]  R. Colombo,et al.  Leaf level detection of solar induced chlorophyll fluorescence by means of a subnanometer resolution spectroradiometer , 2006 .

[55]  Hartmut K. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence corrected for re-absorption by means of absorption and reflectance measurements , 1998 .

[56]  Lawrence A. Corp,et al.  Impact of Spectral Resolution on Solar Induced Fluorescence and Reflectance Indices for Monitoring Vegetation , 2008, IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[57]  W. Verhoef,et al.  Modeling the impact of spectral sensor configurations on the FLD retrieval accuracy of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2011 .

[58]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Leaf bidirectional reflectance and transmittance in corn and soybean , 1989 .

[59]  K. Niyogi,et al.  Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[60]  Jihua Wang,et al.  Detecting solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from field radiance spectra based on the Fraunhofer line principle , 2005, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[61]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Far-red sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence shows ecosystem-specific relationships to gross primary production: An assessment based on observational and modeling approaches , 2015 .

[62]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Innovative LIDAR 3D Dynamic Measurement System to Estimate Fruit-Tree Leaf Area , 2011, Sensors.