Do industries' average firm size, productivity and skill-intensity explain the border effect?

The border effect literature concludes that border-related trade costs, along with the elasticity of substitution, explain why countries trade more with themselves than with other partners.On its hand, the exporting firm literature shows that larger,more productive and more skilled-labour intensive firms are more able to bear with some of those border-related trade costs. In this paper we combine those findings and test whether a larger average firmsize, apparent labour productivity and skill content can reduce the border effect.Using a sample of European countries and an empirical model based on the gravity equation we find that a larger average size, labour-productivity and skill-content reduce the border effect significantly.

[1]  Nikolaus Wolf,et al.  On the origins of border effects: insights from the Habsburg Empire , 2008 .

[2]  Nikolaus Wolf,et al.  Endogenous Borders? The Effects of New Borders on Trade in Central Europe 1885-1933 , 2008 .

[3]  J. Hobbs Technical Barriers to Trade , 2007 .

[4]  Peter K. Schott,et al.  Firms in International Trade , 2006 .

[5]  S. Gil‐Pareja,et al.  The Border Effect in Spain , 2005 .

[6]  David Hummels,et al.  Trade Responses to Geographic Frictions: A Decomposition Using Micro-Data , 2005 .

[7]  Toshihiro Okubo The Border Effect in the Japanese Market: A Gravity Model Analysis , 2004 .

[8]  A. Bernard,et al.  Why Some Firms Export , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  Carolyn L. Evans The Economic Significance of National Border Effects , 2003 .

[10]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Border Effects and the Gravity Equation: Consistent Methods for Estimation , 2002 .

[11]  Natalie Chen,et al.  Intra-National Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter? , 2002 .

[12]  T. Mayer,et al.  Illusory Border Effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade , 2002 .

[13]  Andrew K. Rose,et al.  National Money as a Barrier to International Trade: The Real Case for Currency Union , 2001 .

[14]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[15]  Volker Nitsch National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union , 2000 .

[16]  H. Wolf,et al.  Intranational Home Bias in Trade , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[17]  T. Mayer,et al.  Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU , 2000 .

[18]  David Hummels,et al.  Trade Creation and Trade Diversion : New Empirical Results , 1998 .

[19]  John F. Helliwell,et al.  How Much Do National Borders Matter , 1998 .

[20]  J Wagner,et al.  Export entry and exit by German firms , 1998 .

[21]  M. Lord,et al.  Regional trade patterns , 1998 .

[22]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs , 1997 .

[23]  J. Helliwell National Borders, Trade and Migration , 1997 .

[24]  A. Bernard,et al.  EXPORTERS, SKILL UPGRADING AND THE WAGE GAP* , 1997 .

[25]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[26]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Networks Versus Markets in International Trade , 1996 .

[27]  S. Wei Intra-National Versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? , 1996 .

[28]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[29]  R. Baldwin Towards an Integrated Europe , 1994 .

[30]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Competitividad de la empresa exportadora española , 1994 .

[31]  S. Wei,et al.  Emerging Currency Blocs , 1993 .