Factors Associated With Adoption of the Electronic Health Record System Among Primary Care Physicians

Background A territory-wide Internet-based electronic patient record allows better patient care in different sectors. The engagement of private physicians is one of the major facilitators for implementation, but there is limited information about the current adoption level of electronic medical record (eMR) among private primary care physicians. Objective This survey measured the adoption level, enabling factors, and hindering factors of eMR, among private physicians in Hong Kong. It also evaluated the key functions and the popularity of electronic systems and vendors used by these private practitioners. Methods A central registry consisting of 4324 private practitioners was set up. Invitations for self-administered surveys and the completed questionnaires were sent and returned via fax, email, postal mail, and on-site clinic visits. Current users and non-users of eMR system were compared according to their demographic and practice characteristics. Student’s t tests and chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results A total of 524 completed surveys (response rate 524/4405 11.90%) were collected. The proportion of using eMR in private clinics was 79.6% (417/524). When compared with non-users, the eMR users were younger (users: 48.4 years SD 10.6 years vs non-users: 61.7 years SD 10.2 years, P<.001); more were female physicians (users: 80/417, 19.2% vs non-users: 14/107, 13.1%, P=.013); possessed less clinical experience (with more than20 years of practice: users: 261/417, 62.6% vs non-user: 93/107, 86.9%, P<.001); fewer worked under a Health Maintenance Organization (users: 347/417, 83.2% vs non-users: 97/107, 90.7%, P<.001) and more worked with practice partners (users: 126/417, 30.2% vs non-users: 4/107, 3.7%, P<.001). Efficiency (379/417, 90.9%) and reduction of medical errors (229/417, 54.9%) were the major enabling factors, while patient-unfriendliness (58/107, 54.2%) and limited consultation time (54/107, 50.5%) were the most commonly reported hindering factors. The key functions of computer software among eMR users consisted of electronic patient registration system (376/417, 90.2%), drug dispensing system (328/417, 78.7%) and electronic drug labels (296/417, 71.0%). SoftLink Clinic Solution was the most popular vendor (160/417, 38.4%). Conclusions These findings identified several physician groups who should be targeted for more assistance on eMR installation and its adoption. Future studies should address the barriers of using Internet-based eMR to enhance its adoption.

[1]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[2]  Gary G Bennett,et al.  Barriers and Facilitators to Home Computer and Internet Use Among Urban Novice Computer Users of Low Socioeconomic Position , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  A. Chan HONG KONG MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. , 2015, Japan Medical Association journal : JMAJ.

[4]  Melissa Steward Electronic Medical Records , 2005, The Journal of legal medicine.

[5]  Kenneth D Mandl,et al.  Acceptability of a Personally Controlled Health Record in a Community-Based Setting: Implications for Policy and Design , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Robert A Verheij,et al.  Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: an interview study , 2011, BMC health services research.

[7]  Charles Safran,et al.  Electronic patient records and the impact of the Internet , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Erna Håland,et al.  Introducing the electronic patient record (EPR) in a hospital setting: boundary work and shifting constructions of professional identities. , 2012, Sociology of health & illness.

[9]  Zhiping Walter,et al.  Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Himss Global Enterprise Task Force Electronic Health Records: a Global Perspective , 2008 .

[11]  Kin Wah Fung,et al.  Medical informatics - the state of the art in the Hospital Authority , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Elisa Cascade,et al.  Conducting Research on the Internet: Medical Record Data Integration with Patient-Reported Outcomes , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  P. Clayton,et al.  Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[14]  J. K. Johnsen,et al.  Physician Response Time When Communicating With Patients Over the Internet , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Jeremy C Wyatt,et al.  Opportunities for and challenges of computerisation , 1998, The Lancet.

[16]  C. Chronaki,et al.  eHealth Trends in Europe 2005-2007: A Population-Based Survey , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Yu-Fang Chung,et al.  A Study on Agent-Based Secure Scheme for Electronic Medical Record System , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[18]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[19]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[21]  K Ann McKibbon,et al.  Health Information Technology to Facilitate Communication Involving Health Care Providers, Caregivers, and Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Vicky Fung,et al.  Principles-Based Medical Informatics for Success - How Hong Kong Built One of the World's Largest Integrated Longitudinal Electronic Patient Records , 2007, MedInfo.