The goal is to study the three-dimensional (3-D) flow produced by a propeller operating in a 3-D approach flow representative of pusher-prop arrangements on aircraft or underwater vehicles. The research involves both numerical predictions and wind-tunnel experiments. The specific nonuniform inflow studied is generated by a varying mesh screen disk of one large-diameter mesh, one smaller-diameter mesh, and a 30-deg mesh wedge aligned with the tip of the wedge and the centers of the two circular screens matching. This inflow is similar to the wake behind a slender axisymmetric body with a slender planar appendage. The propeller has three blades, and is "self-propell ed" with respect to the drag of the screen disk. The testing is divided into two main parts. The first deals with propeller performance and the condition needed to reach a self-propelled mode. The second part is the measurement of the mean and turbulent flow downstream of the propeller for two axial locations, x/D - 0.025 and 0.5. The computational work is part of a step-by-step approach to development of a method for analysis of propeller flowfields with three-dimensional inflows of increasing complexity. The fully elliptic, 3-D, Reynolds-averaged, steady-state, primitive-variables Navier-Stokes equations are solved by a Penalty Finite-Element Method. Turbulence modeling is through the integrated turbulence-kinetic-energy (TKE) model. The length scale is algebraically related to the axial velocity profiles. The propeller is modeled as an actuator disk. The mesh disk is modeled as a distribution of axial-body forces, which are related to the local "drag". Generally, the agreement achieved between predictions and experiment is considered excellent for a 3-D, turbulent flow of this complexity.
[1]
J. A. Schetz,et al.
Experimental studies of the turbulent wake behind self-propelled slender bodies
,
1975
.
[2]
W. Valarezo,et al.
Time-averaged subsonic propeller flowfield calculations
,
1986
.
[3]
J A Schetz,et al.
Numerical solution of a body-propeller combination flow including swirl and comparisons with data
,
1979
.
[4]
M. Engelman,et al.
FIDAP (A Fluid Dynamics Analysis Program)
,
1982
.
[5]
J. A. Schetz,et al.
Finite element Navier-Stokes calculation of three-dimensional turbulent flow near a propeller
,
1986
.
[6]
L. J. Bober,et al.
Summary of recent NASA propeller research
,
1984
.
[7]
Frederick Stern,et al.
Viscous flow around a propeller-shaft configuration with infinite-pitch rectangular blades
,
1990
.
[8]
P. M. Sforza,et al.
Studies on three-dimensional viscous jets.
,
1965
.
[9]
Joseph A. Schetz,et al.
NUMERICAL SOLUTION FOR THE NEAR WAKE OF A BODY WITH PROPELLER
,
1977
.
[10]
Joseph A. Schetz,et al.
Foundations of Boundary Layer Theory for Momentum, Heat, and Mass Transfer
,
1984
.
[11]
J. A. Schetz,et al.
Measurements of three-dimensional turbulent flow behind a propeller in a shear flow
,
1986
.
[12]
L. J. Bober,et al.
Inviscid analysis of advanced turboprop propeller flow fields
,
1985
.