Role of knowledge in human visual temporal integration in spatiotemporal noise.

Previous studies have shown how human observers' knowledge about the signal's spatial frequency, spatial phase, and spatial locations affects human performance in detecting and identifying signals in spatial noise. These results have led to the idea that human observers can be modeled as suboptimal Bayesian observers that use a priori information to generate probabilities or likelihoods for hypothesis. This approach has also been applied more recently to object recognition. We investigate whether human observers have the ability to use information about the temporal profile of a temporally modulated signal in temporal information processing. We measure human performance in detecting a time-varying signal embedded in spatiotemporal (dynamic) noise with and without a cue that contains information about the temporal phase of the signal. Results show improvement in performance in the phase-cued condition, suggesting that human observers act as if they have the ability to use knowledge about the temporal shape of the signal when performing temporal information processing. Human performance is consistent with a suboptimal Bayesian observer and a newly proposed Max-Min observer. The results also suggest that models based solely on the integration of the early temporal filters in the human visual system and/or any further integration (e.g., probability summation), which do not make use of knowledge about the signals' temporal profile, are incomplete models of human visual detection in spatiotemporal noise.

[1]  W. P. Tanner PHYSIOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL DATA * , 1961, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Dodwell Pc,et al.  On perceptual clarity. , 1971 .

[3]  H Ghandeharian,et al.  Visual signal detection. I. Ability to use phase information. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  S. Watamaniuk Ideal observer for discrimination of the global direction of dynamic random-dot stimuli. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[6]  H. Barlow Retinal noise and absolute threshold. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[7]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[8]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[9]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[10]  T Cohn,et al.  Detection of a luminance increment: effect of temporal uncertainty. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  J. Robson Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[12]  G. Lowe,et al.  Channel, temporal, and composite uncertainty in the detection and recognition of auditory and visual signals , 1971 .

[13]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  H. Barlow The efficiency of detecting changes of density in random dot patterns , 1978, Vision Research.

[16]  C W Thomas,et al.  Model for perception of pulsed fluoroscopy image sequences. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  A Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. III. On Bayesian use of prior knowledge and cross correlation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[18]  David C. Knill,et al.  Object classification for human and ideal observers , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  W. A. Wickelgren,et al.  Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments , 1968 .

[20]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[21]  T. Cohn,et al.  Detectability of a luminance increment: effect of spatial uncertainty. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.