Pedophysical Models for Resistivity and Permittivity of Partially Water‐Saturated Soils

Geophysical field surveys can be used for mapping soil properties such as clay and water content. For this the choice of adequate geophysical pedo-transfer functions (GPTF) is a still debated question because of ambiguities of influencing factors. To investigate the applicability of different GPTFs to typical central European soils, we conducted laboratory measurements on 23 samples. The results are datasets of electrical resistivity and dielectric permittivity as a function of water content and partly temperature. We used these data to validate and improve existing GPTFs. For the relationship between permittivity and water content, we applied published empirical regressions, volumetric mixing, and effective media models. All models show low RMSE (0.3−6.8l%, v/v), but the curvatures of the data points are not reproducible by the empirical models. The volumetric mixing and the effective media models can fit the trend of the data points for sandy soils but not for clayey soils. To improve these models, we propose a modification to the Hanai–Bruggeman-type effective media approach. It uses the permittivity of almost dry soil as a background and embeds stepwise increasing amounts of water. It turned out that our approach yields satisfying fits with respect to both data trends and RMSE (0.3–1.5l% v/v). Based on this approach we define a joint model for permittivities and resistivities, which yield RMSE of only 0.7 to 1.4% (v/v)—better than most published models. Our validations show that the temperature effects on electrical resistivity can be reliably corrected using existing empirical relationships.

[1]  A. Brovelli,et al.  Combined estimation of effective electrical conductivity and permittivity for soil monitoring , 2011 .

[2]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Modelling the Electrical Properties of Porous Rocks and Soils Containing Immiscible Contaminants , 1996 .

[3]  D. Corwin,et al.  Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture , 2005 .

[4]  R. Schulin,et al.  Calibration of time domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite dielectric approach , 1990 .

[5]  U. Kaatze Complex Permittivity of Water as a Function of Frequency and Temperature , 1989 .

[6]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[7]  W. Bouten,et al.  Soil water content measurements at different scales: accuracy of time domain reflectometry and ground-penetrating radar , 2001 .

[8]  M. H. Waxman,et al.  Electrical Conductivities in Oil-Bearing Shaly Sands , 1968 .

[9]  Müller,et al.  GPR study of pore water content and salinity in sand , 2000 .

[10]  D. A. G. Bruggeman Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen , 1935 .

[11]  S. A. Hagrey,et al.  GPR Application for Mapping Toluene Infiltration in a Heterogeneous Sand Model , 2004 .

[12]  P. N. Sen,et al.  Relation of certain geometrical features to the dielectric anomaly of rocks , 1981 .

[13]  Shechao Feng,et al.  Geometrical model of conductive and dielectric properties of partially saturated rocks , 1985 .

[14]  Nigel J. Cassidy,et al.  Chapter 2 – Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Rocks, Soils and Fluids , 2009 .

[15]  L. Cathles,et al.  Electrical conductivity in shaly sands with geophysical applications , 1998 .

[16]  O. H. Jacobsen,et al.  A laboratory calibration of time domain reflectometry for soil water measurement including effects of bulk density and texture , 1993 .

[17]  Paul F. Worthington,et al.  The uses and abuses of the Archie equations, 1: The formation factor-porosity relationship , 1993 .

[18]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[19]  C. G. Gardner,et al.  High dielectric constant microwave probes for sensing soil moisture , 1974 .

[20]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  Dielectric properties of soils in the 0.3-1.3-GHz range , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  R. Barker,et al.  Modelling the DC electrical response of fully and partially saturated Permo‐Triassic sandstone , 2006 .

[22]  J. J. Arps The Effect of Temperature on the Density and Electrical Resistivity of Sodium Chloride Solutions , 1953 .

[23]  R. Plagge,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the relationship between soil dielectric constant and volumetric water conte , 1992 .

[24]  S. Dasberg,et al.  Time Domain Reflectometry Measurements of Water Content and Electrical Conductivity of Layered Soil Columns , 1991 .

[25]  S. A. Hagrey,et al.  Hydro-, bio-geophysics , 2004 .

[26]  Influence of grain size, shape and compaction on georadar waves: examples of aeolian dunes , 2012, 1208.3936.

[27]  P. N. Sen,et al.  A self-similar model for sedimentary rocks with application to the dielectric constant of fused glass beads , 1981 .

[28]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Comparison of Petrophysical Relationships for Soil Moisture Estimation using GPR Ground Waves , 2011 .

[29]  R. Gebbers,et al.  Electrical conductivity mapping for precision farming , 2009 .