Diagnosis of skeletal form on the lateral cephalogram with a finite element-based expert system.

Orthodontic diagnosis depends largely on the current methods of cephalometric analysis and categorization. It is therefore unfortunate that such analyses tend to use inappropriate metrical systems that lack a rigorous scientific basis. As a consequence, the resultant data have questionable validity, as well as being subject to observer bias. In this study, an alternative, more rigorous, approach is described. A random sample of 126 pretreatment lateral cephalograms were analyzed with the finite element method. These data were then classified to form a training set or reference data base for the subsequent objective diagnosis of new, previously unclassified cases. This new case-classification system was based on matching the new cases to similar cases within the existing training set. The degree of concordance between such computer-matched cases was then evaluated by their subsequent conventional cephalometric analyses.

[1]  R. Sokal,et al.  Principles of numerical taxonomy , 1965 .

[2]  F L Bookstein,et al.  On the cephalometrics of skeletal change. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[3]  J. Ahlgren Mechanism of mastication , 1966 .

[4]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Differential diagnosis of class II malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with class II malocclusions. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[5]  Sheldon Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements , 1971 .

[6]  F. Bookstein Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two Dimensions , 1986 .

[7]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[8]  R. Corruccini Shape in morphometrics: Comparative analyses , 1987 .

[9]  W. Bachrach,et al.  The measurement of form and variation in form: an application of three-dimensional quantitative morphology by finite-element methods. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Part 1. Facial types associated with Class II malocclusions , 1980 .

[11]  Hans-Hermann Bock,et al.  Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis , 1988 .

[12]  Robert E. Moyers,et al.  Handbook of Orthodontics , 1963 .

[13]  F. Bookstein,et al.  The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[14]  W. Howells The use of multivariate techniques in the study of skeletal populations. , 1969, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  C. R. Rao,et al.  The Utilization of Multiple Measurements in Problems of Biological Classification , 1948 .

[16]  J. Mosimann,et al.  NEW STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ALLOMETRY WITH APPLICATION TO FLORIDA RED‐WINGED BLACKBIRDS , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Coenraad F. A. Moorrees,et al.  Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs , 1958 .

[18]  George Gaylord Simpson,et al.  The Principles of Classification and a Classification of Mammals. , 1945 .

[19]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Le Fort III Advancement Osteotomy in the Growing Child , 1984, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  M Shinozuka,et al.  Finite element method modeling of craniofacial growth. , 1985, American journal of orthodontics.

[21]  R. Moyers,et al.  Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics , 1986 .

[22]  D'arcy W. Thompson On growth and form i , 1943 .

[23]  R E Moyers,et al.  A method of deriving subgroups of a population: a study of craniofacial taxonomy. , 1973, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  D. Wishart Clustan : user manual , 1978 .

[25]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[26]  G. Thompson,et al.  Craniofacial templates for orthodontic case analysis. , 1977, American journal of orthodontics.

[27]  F. Bookstein,et al.  A comparative cephalometric study of the cranial base in craniofacial anomalies: Part I: Tensor analysis. , 1985, The Cleft palate journal.

[28]  V M Diewert,et al.  Measuring histological form change with finite element methods: an application using diazo-oxo-norleucine (DON)-treated rats. , 1986, The American journal of anatomy.

[29]  Michael L. Riolo,et al.  An Atlas of craniofacial growth : cephalometric standards from the University school growth study, the University of Michigan , 1974 .

[30]  Robert M. Ricketts,et al.  A foundation for cephalometric communication , 1960 .

[31]  F. Bookstein A statistical method for biological shape comparisons. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Describing a craniofacial anomaly: finite elements and the biometrics of landmark locations. , 1987, American journal of physical anthropology.

[33]  C. Goodall [Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two Dimensions]: Comment , 1986 .

[34]  J T Richtsmeier,et al.  Finite element scaling analysis of human craniofacial growth. , 1986, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[35]  Donald G. Morrison,et al.  Measurement Problems in Cluster Analysis , 1967 .

[36]  H. Blum Biological shape and visual science (part I) , 1973 .

[37]  F L Bookstein,et al.  The geometry of craniofacial growth invariants. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.