Riemannian Elasticity: A Statistical Regularization Framework for Non-linear Registration

In inter-subject registration, one often lacks a good model of the transformation variability to choose the optimal regularization. Some works attempt to model the variability in a statistical way, but the re-introduction in a registration algorithm is not easy. In this paper, we interpret the elastic energy as the distance of the Green-St Venant strain tensor to the identity, which reflects the deviation of the local deformation from a rigid transformation. By changing the Euclidean metric for a more suitable Riemannian one, we define a consistent statistical framework to quantify the amount of deformation. In particular, the mean and the covariance matrix of the strain tensor can be consistently and efficiently computed from a population of non-linear transformations. These statistics are then used as parameters in a Mahalanobis distance to measure the statistical deviation from the observed variability, giving a new regularization criterion that we called the statistical Riemannian elasticity. This new criterion is able to handle anisotropic deformations and is inverse-consistent. Preliminary results show that it can be quite easily implemented in a non-rigid registration algorithms.

[1]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Brain Image Analysis and Atlas Construction , 2000 .

[2]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Automatic Construction of 3D Statistical Deformation Models of the Brain using Non-Rigid Registration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal Geodesic Analysis on Symmetric Spaces: Statistics of Diffusion Tensors , 2004, ECCV Workshops CVAMIA and MMBIA.

[4]  Roger P. Woods,et al.  Characterizing volume and surface deformations in an atlas framework: theory, applications, and implementation , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  Ioannis A. Kakadiaris,et al.  Computer Vision and Mathematical Methods in Medical and Biomedical Image Analysis , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[6]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2005, 8th International Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, October 26-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part II , 2005, MICCAI.

[7]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Riemannian Framework for Tensor Computing , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Alejandro F Frangi,et al.  Automatic construction of 3-D statistical deformation models of the brain using nonrigid registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Consistent image registration , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Extrapolation of Sparse Tensor Fields: Application to the Modeling of Brain Variability , 2005, IPMI.

[11]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Non-linear Registration with the Variable Viscosity Fluid Algorithm , 1999, IPMI.

[12]  Jan Modersitzki,et al.  Numerical Methods for Image Registration , 2004 .

[13]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Fast and Simple Calculus on Tensors in the Log-Euclidean Framework , 2005, MICCAI.

[14]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[15]  P. Fillard,et al.  Dispositif perfectionné de traitement ou de production d'images de tenseurs , 2006 .

[16]  Maher Moakher,et al.  A rigorous framework for diffusion tensor calculus , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  O. Faugeras,et al.  Statistics on Multivariate Normal Distributions: A Geometric Approach and its Application to Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2004 .

[19]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Grid powered nonlinear image registration with locally adaptive regularization , 2004, Medical Image Anal..