Multidimensional extension of the continuity equation method for debris clouds evolution

As the debris spatial density increases due to recent collisions and inoperative spacecraft, the probability of collisions in space grows. Even a collision involving small objects may produce thousands of fragments due to the high orbital velocity and the high energy released. The propagation of the trajectories of all the objects produced by a breakup would be prohibitive in terms of computational time; therefore, simplified models are needed to describe the consequences of a collision with a reasonable computational effort. The continuity approach can be applied to this purpose as it allows switching the point of view from the analysis of each single fragment to the study of the evolution of the debris cloud globally. Previous formulations of the continuity equation approach focussed on the representation of the drag effect on the fragment spatial density. This work proposes how the continuity equation approach can be extended to multiple dimensions in the phase space defined by the relevant orbital parameters. This novel approach allows including in the propagation also the effect of the Earth’s oblateness and improving the description of the drag effect by considering the distribution of area-to-mass ratio and eccentricity among the fragments. Results for these three applications are shown and discussed in terms of accuracy compared to the numerical propagation and to the one-dimensional approach.

[1]  D. McKnight A phased approach to collision hazard analysis , 1990 .

[2]  Davis S. F. Portree,et al.  Orbital Debris: A Chronology , 1999 .

[3]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[4]  R. Broucke,et al.  The effect of the Earth's oblateness on the long-term dispersion of debris , 1993 .

[5]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[6]  D. King-hele,et al.  Satellite orbits in an atmosphere : theory and applications , 1987 .

[7]  Colin R. McInnes Simple Analytic Model of the Long-Term Evolution of Nanosatellite Constellations , 2000 .

[8]  Donald J. Kessler,et al.  Derivation of the collision probability between orbiting objects: the lifetimes of jupiter's outer moons , 1981 .

[9]  Mark V. Sykes,et al.  Zodiacal dust bands - Their relation to asteroid families , 1989 .

[10]  John C. Mather,et al.  A New Approach to Dynamical Evolution of Interplanetary Dust , 1997 .

[11]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Analytical Model for the Propagation of Small-Debris-Object Clouds After Fragmentations , 2015 .

[12]  R McinnesC,et al.  An Analytical Model for the Catastrophic Production of Orbital Debris. , 1993 .

[13]  N. Smirnov,et al.  Modelling of the space debris evolution based on continua mechanics , 2001 .

[14]  Adam E. White,et al.  The many futures of active debris removal , 2014 .

[15]  Ruediger Jehn Dispersion of debris clouds from on-orbit fragmentation events , 1990 .

[16]  N. Johnson,et al.  NASA's new breakup model of evolve 4.0 , 2001 .

[17]  Compact analytic solutions for a decaying, precessing circular orbit , 1994, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[18]  Hugh G. Lewis,et al.  Collision Probability Due to Space Debris Clouds Through a Continuum Approach , 2016 .

[19]  P. H. Krisko,et al.  Modeling of LEO orbital debris populations for ORDEM2008 , 2009 .

[20]  Joshua Ashenberg Formulas for the phase characteristics in the problem of low-Earth-orbital debris , 1994 .

[21]  Florent Deleflie,et al.  Semi-analytical theory of mean orbital motion for geosynchronous space debris under gravitational influence , 2009 .

[22]  Ukraine,et al.  Quasi-Stationary States of Dust Flows under Poynting-Robertson Drag: New Analytical and Numerical Solutions , 1997 .

[23]  P. Farinella,et al.  Modelling the evolution of the space debris population , 1998 .