What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop

We report our efforts to assess the skill of contemplating and evaluating argumentation. An adaptive forced-choice instrument was developed and administered to 6th grade students, 7th grade students who had participated in a year-long intervention that successfully strengthened their argumentation production skills, and expert arguers. The instrument was sensitive enough to detect differences in skill level across these groups. Despite their gains in production skill, however, 7th graders showed only modest superiority over the untrained 6th graders and performance well below that of experts. Meta-level demands involved in evaluation but not present in production, we propose, may make evaluation more difficult.

[1]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[2]  A. Sedlak,et al.  A Review of Children's Use of Causal Inference Principles. , 1981 .

[3]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[4]  D. Walton.  Dialogue theory for critical thinking , 1989 .

[5]  D. Walton.  Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[6]  David Moshman,et al.  Adolescent Psychological Development: Rationality, Morality, and Identity , 1999 .

[7]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Explanation and evidence in informal argument , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[9]  D. Kuhn.  How do People Know? , 2001, Psychological science.

[10]  Selma Leitão,et al.  Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments , 2003 .

[11]  Gerald Graff,et al.  Clueless in Academe: How Schooling Obscures the Life of the Mind , 2003 .

[12]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  The development of argument skills. , 2003, Child development.

[13]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[14]  P. Klaczynski.  A dual-process model of adolescent development: implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity. , 2004, Advances in child development and behavior.

[15]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The Second Decade: What Develops (and How) , 2007 .

[16]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument , 2007 .

[17]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments , 2007 .

[18]  Laurence Simonneaux,et al.  Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview , 2007 .

[19]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Reasoning About Multiple Variables: Control of Variables Is Not the Only Challenge , 2007 .

[20]  Human reasoning and argumentation: the probabilistic approach , 2008 .

[21]  R. Duschl.  Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[22]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Arguing on the computer: a microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. , 2008, Child development.

[23]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Coordinating the effects of multiple variables: a skill fundamental to scientific thinking. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[24]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Improving Students' Evaluation of Informal Arguments , 2009, Journal of experimental education.