CS and US duration effects in one-trial simultaneous fear conditioning as assessed by conditioned suppression of licking in rats

In three experiments, rats received a single presentation of an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) beginning simultaneously with an electric grid-shock unconditioned stimulus (US). Later, the CS was presented while the rats licked a drinking tube for water, and CS-elicited suppression of licking was taken as an index of the excitation conditioned to the CS. It was found that conditioning increased as a joint function of the duration of CS-US overlap and US duration. The evidence suggested that weak conditioning due to a brief CS-US overlap could be increased by extending the US beyond CS termination. Extending CS duration beyond US termination, however, did not strengthen conditioning; indeed, extending the CS 60 sec beyond US termination weakened conditioning significantly. It is suggested that these results shed light on a discrepancy in the recent literature on simultaneous conditioning.

[1]  F. Wilcoxon SOME RAPID APPROXIMATE STATISTICAL PROCEDURES , 1950 .

[2]  M. Oh,et al.  Contiguity vs. drive-reduction in conditioned fear: temporal variations in conditioned and unconditioned stimulus. , 1954 .

[3]  G. Barnes Conditioned stimulus intensity and temporal factors in spaced-trial classical conditioning. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Y. Matsumiya THE EFFECTS OF US INTENSITY AND CS-US PATTERN ON CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE , 1960 .

[5]  H S HOFFMAN,et al.  A relay sequencing device for scrambling grid shock. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  N. Schneiderman Interstimulus interval function of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit under delay versus trace conditioning. , 1966 .

[7]  R. Rescorla Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. , 1967, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Papsdorf,et al.  The effects of an interpolated ITI stimulus on classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response of the rabbit , 1967 .

[9]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Situational cues and correlation between CS and US as determinants of the conditioned emotional response , 1970 .

[10]  M. Domjan,et al.  Backward conditoning as an inhibitory procedure , 1971 .

[11]  R. Rescorla,et al.  A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement , 1972 .

[12]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  Rehearsal in animal conditioning. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  D. Riess,et al.  UCS duration and conditioned suppression: Acquisition and extinction between-groups and terminal performance within-subjects , 1973 .

[14]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[15]  Heith Cd,et al.  Simultaneous and backward fear conditioning in the rat. , 1973 .

[16]  J. Ayres,et al.  US-alone presentations as an extinction procedure , 1973 .

[17]  R. Shipley Extinction of conditioned fear in rats as a function of several parameters of CS exposure. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[18]  The inhibitory effect of backward conditioning as a function of the number of backward pairings , 1974 .

[19]  J. Ayres,et al.  One-trial simultaneous and backward fear conditioning as reflected in conditioned suppression of licking in rats , 1976 .