Dynamics of maculo-ocular reflexes in the frog

Compensatory torsional and vertical eye movements were recorded in the frog during sinusoidal linear acceleration along the longitudinal and transverse body axes, respectively. Stimulus frequencies ranged between 0.1 and 1.0 Hz and peak accelerations from 0.01 g to 0.1 g corresponding to body tilts ranging from 0.57 to 5.7 degrees. In addition, static compensatory eye movements were studied during fore-and-aft and lateral body tilt over ranges of +/- 10 degrees. The evoked eye movements were generally quite small (+/- 0.5 degree). Dynamic gain (rotation of the eye/apparent rotation of gravity direction) was 0.10-0.20 at 0.1 Hz and decreased to about 0.05 at 1.0 Hz. The gain of vertical eye movements was somewhat higher than that of torsional eye movements. Phase lag relative to peak accelerations increased from about 10 degrees to about 45 degrees over the same frequency range. Static compensatory eye movements evoked by nose-up and ipsilateral side-up tilt were larger in amplitude than those evoked by nose-down and ipsilateral side-down tilt. Static gain (rotation of the eye/tilt of the whole body) was about 0.10 for vertical and about 0.06 for torsional eye movements. No consistent eye movements could be evoked by vertical sinusoidal accelerations (maximal modulation amplitudes +/- 0.025 g). The results indicate that, as in other vertebrates, maculo-ocular reflexes contribute to gaze stabilization in the frog mainly during low frequency and static head and body tilts.

[1]  H. Collewijn,et al.  A search for habituation of vestibulo-ocular reactions to rotatory and linear sinusoidal accelerations in the rabbit , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[2]  H Collewijn,et al.  Eye movements due to linear accelerations in the rabbit. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  W. Abend,et al.  Response to static tilts of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  B Cohen,et al.  Labyrinthine and extra-labyrinthine effects on ocular counter-rolling. , 1971, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  R. D. Saunders,et al.  Otolith-controlled response from the first-order neurons of the labyrinth of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) to changes in linear acceleration , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  N. Barmack,et al.  The Influences of Head Orientation and Bilateral Semicircular Canal Plugs upon the Vertical Vestibuloocular Reflex of the Rabbit , 1981 .

[7]  B. Cohen The Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Arc , 1974 .

[8]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Dr. Han Collewijn,et al.  The Oculomotor System of the Rabbit and Its Plasticity , 1981, Studies of Brain Function.

[11]  J. Segundo,et al.  Activity of cells in the lateral vestibular nucleus as a function of head position , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  S G Diamond,et al.  BINOCULAR COUNTERROLLING IN HUMANS WITH UNILATERAL LABYRINTHECTOMY AND IN NORMAL CONTROLS , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  John H. Anderson,et al.  OCULAR TORSION IN THE CAT AFTER LESIONS OF THE INTERSTITIAL NUCLEUS OF CAJAL * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.