Control in less-hierarchical multinationals: The role of personal networks and informal communication

The principal aim of this paper is to examine the presumption that a higher degree of decentralization, accompanied by a reduction in hierarchical levels, leads to intensified and effective horizontal communication across units and organization levels. It is argued that, in fact, personal networks and informal communication within the decentralized MNC can be distorted, even damaged by the structural changes, and the informal processes may actually work against the intended communication flows. The nature of both personal networks and informal communication makes control difficult yet, given the importance, MNCs inevitably utilize a variety of approaches in an attempt to influence their operation, sometimes in a counter-productive way.

[1]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[2]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  Managing Networks in International Business , 1992 .

[3]  R. Marschan.  New structural forms and inter-unit communication in multinationals : the case of Kone Elevators , 1996 .

[4]  C. Hendry.  Human Resource Strategies for International Growth , 1994 .

[5]  J. Johanson,et al.  Managing in International Multi-Centre Firms , 1992 .

[6]  Lawrence S. Welch,et al.  Using personnel to develop networks: An approach to subsidiary management , 1993 .

[7]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing the Global Firm , 1990 .

[8]  M. Brooke,et al.  The strategy of multinational enterprise , 1970 .

[9]  G. Hedlund.  The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[10]  William G. Egelhoff.  Information-processing Theory and the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[11]  Birgitta Södergren,et al.  Decentralisering : förändring i företag och arbetsliv , 1992 .

[12]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[13]  Denice Welch,et al.  Staff transfers as a control strategy: An exploratory study of two Australian organizations , 1994 .

[14]  D. Ford,et al.  Understanding Business Markets , 1997 .

[15]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Organization Theory and the Multinational Corporation. , 1993 .

[16]  C. Bartlett,et al.  Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1990 .

[17]  Daniel A. Ondrack,et al.  International Transfers of Managers in North American and European MNEs , 1985 .

[18]  C. Antonelli.  The Economics of Information Networks , 1992 .

[19]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[20]  H. Willmott.  STRENGTH IS IGNORANCE; SLAVERY IS FREEDOM: MANAGING CULTURE IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS* , 1993 .

[21]  L. Melin.  Internationalization as a strategy process , 1992 .

[22]  Michael H. Hoppe,et al.  The effects of national culture on the theory and practice of managing R&D professionals abroad , 1993 .

[23]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[24]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Matrix management: not a structure, a frame of mind. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[25]  V. Meek,et al.  Organizational Culture: Origins and Weaknesses , 1988 .

[26]  Malcolm Borg,et al.  International transfers of managers in multinational corporations , 1988 .

[27]  Len Holden,et al.  Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Perspective , 1994 .

[28]  Peter J. Dowling,et al.  International Dimensions of Human Resource Management , 1990 .