Although the number of women receiving doctorates and in academic positions has increased over the past 20 yr, females still are under-represented on university faculties. The extent of and reasons for this inequity are discussed. There are four critical periods that influence the retention of women in science: early childhood, adolescence, college, and the graduate school/job entry period. For each of the later three periods, the paper addresses the relationship between self-esteem and job performance, the quality and impacts of classroom interactions, and the role of the advisor/mentor. In addition, some of the difficulties in combining career and family responsibilities are considered. Effective networking and mentoring play an important role at the faculty level. If our goal is to have a scientific community open equally to all members of the general population, it is necessary to keep adolescent girls involved in math and science and to maintain their self-esteem. New faculty need to be more completely included in departmental and professional activities through both formal programs and good neighborliness on the behalf of existing faculty.
[1]
B. Uzzi,et al.
The paradox of critical mass for women in science.
,
1994,
Science.
[2]
Patricia E. White,et al.
Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering: An Update.
,
1992
.
[3]
E. Byrne,et al.
Women and Science: The Snark Syndrome.
,
1993
.
[4]
Mary J. Oates,et al.
Women's Colleges and Women Achievers
,
1978,
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
[5]
J. Travis,et al.
Making Room for Women in the Culture of Science
,
1993,
Science.
[6]
P. Clance,et al.
The Imposter Phenomenon: An Internal Barrier to Empowerment and Achievement
,
1987
.
[7]
Myra Sadker,et al.
Failing at fairness
,
1994
.
[8]
F. Crosby.
Juggling: The Unexpected Advantages of Balancing Career and Home for Women and Their Families
,
1991
.
[9]
L. Brown.
Meeting at the Crossroads
,
1992
.
[10]
Richard Pearson,et al.
Women in science and engineering
,
1985,
Nature.