Sustainability assessment framework for engineering and sciences educational institutions in developing countries

There are different factors that may impact the technological, organizational, social, and pedagogical innovation necessary for improving the existing Governmental Egyptian Engineering and Sciences educational institutions to enable offering a more sustainable learning environment for Egyptian students and faculty members. This paper proposes a sustainability assessment framework that can help these educational institutions in achieving the required transformation towards a more sustainable education. First, a literature review is conducted to identify the sustainability factors that need to be considered in achieving a more sustainable education environment in Egypt. Those factors are then tailored to satisfy the Egyptian educational environment through experts’ interviews and gap analysis. The factors are then ranked through a survey questionnaire and experts’ judgment using a 5-point Likert scale to identify the most significant factors, based on the Pareto principal. A case study of a learning institution in Egypt is adapted to identify the gaps in light of the highly prioritized factors in order to develop guidelines and provide recommendations for improvement.

[1]  Bhavik R. Bakshi,et al.  Towards sustainability of engineered processes: Designing self-reliant networks of technological-ecological systems , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[2]  Peter A. C. Smith Elements of organizational sustainability , 2011 .

[3]  Lael Parrott,et al.  Network Theory in the Assessment of the Sustainability of Social–Ecological Systems , 2012 .

[4]  L Potvin,et al.  Program sustainability: focus on organizational routines. , 2004, Health promotion international.

[5]  Annette Evans,et al.  Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies , 2009 .

[6]  Peter A. C. Smith The importance of organizational learning for organizational sustainability , 2012 .

[7]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Engineering Statistics , 2004, Technometrics.

[8]  Ernest H. Forman,et al.  Multi Criteria Decision Making and the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[9]  D. Ho,et al.  Social sustainability in urban renewal: An assessment of community aspirations , 2012 .

[10]  G. Assefa,et al.  Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: A case study of energy technologies , 2007 .

[11]  Lindsay Cole ASSESSING SUSTAINABILITY ON CANADIAN UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES: DEVELOPMENT OF A CAMPUS SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK , 2003 .

[12]  M. Ruiz,et al.  Sustainability Assessment in Higher Education Institutions , 2020 .

[13]  Uchenna Egodi Ajake,et al.  Sustainable Development in Higher Education: Current Practice and Future Development: A Case Study of University of Calabar-Nigeria. , 2011 .

[14]  Allan Hoi Kau Yuen,et al.  School leadership and teachers’ pedagogical orientations in Hong Kong: A comparative perspective , 2009, Education and Information Technologies.

[15]  G. Wu,et al.  Risk Assessment for Construction Joint Ventures in China , 2001 .

[16]  William M. Lafferty,et al.  Towards Sustainable Development , 1999 .

[17]  Ray Land,et al.  Enhancing quality in higher education : international perspectives , 2013 .

[18]  Mrinal K Ghose Technological challenges for boosting coal production with environmental sustainability , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.