Experimental validation of two dual‐energy CT methods for proton therapy using heterogeneous tissue samples

PURPOSE The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of dual-energy CT (DECT) for determining proton stopping power ratios (SPRs) in an experimental environment and to demonstrate its potential advantages over conventional single-energy CT (SECT) in clinical conditions. METHODS Water equivalent range (WER) measurements of 12 tissue-equivalent plastic materials and 12 fresh animal tissue samples are performed in a 195 MeV broad proton beam using the dose extinction method. SECT and DECT scans of the samples are performed with a dual-source CT scanner (Siemens SOMATOM Definition Flash). The methods of Schneider et al. (1996), Bourque et al. (2014), and Lalonde et al. (2017) are used to predict proton SPR on SECT and DECT images. From predicted SPR values, the WER of the proton beam through the sample is predicted for SECT and DECT using Monte Carlo simulations and compared to the measured WER. RESULTS For homogeneous tissue-equivalent plastic materials, results with DECT are consistent with experimental measurements and show a systematic reduction of SPR uncertainty compared to SECT, with root-mean-square errors of 1.59% versus 0.61% for SECT and DECT, respectively. Measurements with heterogeneous animal samples show a clear reduction of the bias on range predictions in the presence of bones, with -0.88% for SECT versus -0.58% and -0.14% for both DECT methods. An uncertainty budget allows isolating the effect of CT number conversion to SPR and predicts improvements by DECT over SECT consistently with theoretical predictions, with 0.34% and 0.31% for soft tissues and bones in the experimental setup compared to 0.34% and 1.14% with the theoretical method. CONCLUSIONS The present work uses experimental measurements in a realistic clinical environment to show potential benefits of DECT for proton therapy treatment planning. Our results show clear improvements over SECT in tissue-equivalent plastic materials and animal tissues. Further work towards using Monte Carlo simulations for treatment planning with DECT data and a more detailed investigation of the uncertainties on I-value and limitations on the Bragg additivity rule could potentially further enhance the benefits of this imaging technology for proton therapy.

[1]  David K. Brice,et al.  Stopping powers for electrons and positrons (ICRU report 37; International commission on radiation units and measurements, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 1984) , 1985 .

[2]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Richard Pötter,et al.  Treatment planning comparison of conventional, 3D conformal, and intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton therapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Hugo Bouchard,et al.  A general method to derive tissue parameters for Monte Carlo dose calculation with multi-energy CT , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  M. J. Berger ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions , 1992 .

[6]  Hugo Bouchard,et al.  The potential of dual‐energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties , 2017, Medical physics.

[7]  Steffen Greilich,et al.  Ion range estimation by using dual energy computed tomography. , 2013, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[8]  Takeshi Hiraoka,et al.  Energy loss of 70 MeV protons in elements , 1992 .

[9]  Joao Seco,et al.  Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy. , 2014, Medical physics.

[10]  M. Saito Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship. , 2012, Medical physics.

[11]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  Clinical Implementation of Dual-energy CT for Proton Treatment Planning on Pseudo-monoenergetic CT scans. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Antony Lomax,et al.  In vivo proton range verification: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  D. R. White,et al.  The composition of body tissues. , 1986, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  Range prediction for tissue mixtures based on dual-energy CT. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Shota Sagara,et al.  A simple formulation for deriving effective atomic numbers via electron density calibration from dual‐energy CT data in the human body , 2017, Medical physics.

[16]  H. Paganetti Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  H. Bouchard,et al.  A Bayesian approach to solve proton stopping powers from noisy multi‐energy CT data , 2017, Medical physics.

[18]  R. K. Bull,et al.  Stopping powers for electrons and positrons: ICRU Report 37; 271 pp.; 24 figures; U.S. $24.00. , 1986 .

[19]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Density and atomic number measurements with spectral x-ray attenuation method , 2003 .

[20]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Deriving concentrations of oxygen and carbon in human tissues using single- and dual-energy CT for ion therapy applications , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  B. Macq,et al.  Reassessment of stopping power ratio uncertainties caused by mean excitation energies using a water‐based formalism , 2018, Medical physics.

[22]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Comparison of proton therapy treatment planning for head tumors with a pencil beam algorithm on dual and single energy CT images. , 2016, Medical physics.

[23]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Steffen Greilich,et al.  Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Vicki T Taasti,et al.  A robust empirical parametrization of proton stopping power using dual energy CT. , 2016, Medical physics.

[26]  E Pedroni,et al.  The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Alexandra E Bourque,et al.  A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  A linear, separable two-parameter model for dual energy CT imaging of proton stopping power computation. , 2016, Medical physics.

[29]  J. Munzenrider,et al.  Proton therapy for tumors of the skull base , 1999, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[30]  J F Ziegler,et al.  Comments on ICRU report no. 49: stopping powers and ranges for protons and alpha particles. , 1999, Radiation research.

[31]  Takashi Akagi,et al.  Determination of the mean excitation energy of water from proton beam ranges , 2007 .

[32]  J. Seco,et al.  Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Scott N Penfold,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning. , 2016, Medical physics.

[34]  R. Mohan,et al.  Theoretical variance analysis of single- and dual-energy computed tomography methods for calculating proton stopping power ratios of biological tissues , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Investigation of real tissue water equivalent path lengths using an efficient dose extinction method. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of proton range uncertainties related to patient stopping-power-ratio estimation using the stoichiometric calibration , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.