Vector autoregression evidence on monetarism: another look at the robustness debate
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David E. Runkle,et al. Vector Autoregressions and Reality: Reply , 1987 .
[2] M. Friedman,et al. A Monetary History of the United States , 1963 .
[3] P. Whittle. The Analysis of Multiple Stationary Time Series , 1953 .
[4] B. Mccallum. A reconsideration of Sims' evidence concerning monetarism , 1983 .
[5] H. Akaike. A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .
[6] G. Schwarz. Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .
[7] C. Sims. MACROECONOMICS AND REALITY , 1977 .
[8] Lawrence J. Christiano,et al. Searching for a Break in Gnp , 1988 .
[9] Milton Friedman,et al. The Optimum Quantity of Money''in The Optimum Quantity of Money and other essays , 1969 .
[10] D. Runkle,et al. Vector Autoregressions and Reality , 1987 .
[11] C. Sims. Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis , 1986 .
[12] C. Whiteman,et al. Monetary Aggregates as Monetary Targets: A Statistical Investigation , 1992 .
[13] Allan H. Meltzer,et al. Real business cycles, real exchange rates, and actual policies , 1986 .
[14] Lawrence J. Christiano,et al. Temporal Aggregation and Structural Inference in Macroeconomics , 1986 .
[15] Stephen F. LeRoy,et al. Atheoretical macroeconometrics: A critique , 1985 .
[16] Edward E. Leamer,et al. Vector autoregressions for causal inference , 1985 .
[17] Anna J. Schwartz,et al. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. , 1964 .
[18] David E Spencer. Does Money Matter? The Robustness of Evidence from Vector Autoregressions , 1989 .
[19] [Do Equilibrium Real Business Cycle Theories Explain Postwar U. S. Business Cycles?]: Comment , 1986, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.