Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions

This study relied on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to identify the beliefs that influence young people's pro-environmental behavior. High-school students completed a questionnaire regarding the performance of pro-environmental behaviors early in the school year and reported on their behavior toward the end of the year. In addition to the standard TPB constructs, the initial questionnaire assessed descriptive norms, moral norms, sex, and empathic concern. Results revealed an excellent fit for the standard TPB model; attitudes, descriptive subjective norms, and perceptions of control made independent contributions to the prediction of intentions, and intentions together with perceived control predicted behavior. Behavioral, normative, and control beliefs predicted, respectively, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Empathic concern influenced intentions and behavior indirectly by its effects on behavioral, normative, and control beliefs. Examination of the effects of specific beliefs revealed important implications for designing effective behavior-change interventions.

[1]  D. Tindall,et al.  Activism and Conservation Behavior in an Environmental Movement: The Contradictory Effects of Gender , 2003 .

[2]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[3]  R. Gifford,et al.  Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. , 2014, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[4]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis , 2003 .

[5]  M. Haller,et al.  Global activism and nationally driven recycling: The influence of world society and national contexts on public and private environmental behavior , 2011 .

[6]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Determinants of young Australians’ environmental actions: the role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes , 2012 .

[7]  R. Gifford Environmental psychology matters. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Elizabeth Ann Bragg,et al.  Towards ecological self : Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory , 1996 .

[9]  P. Schultz New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[10]  J. Berenguer The Effect of Empathy in Environmental Moral Reasoning , 2010 .

[11]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[12]  Aaron Johnson,et al.  Cross‐National Gender Variation in Environmental Behaviors , 2004 .

[13]  P. Stern Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[14]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Understanding teen attitudes towards energy consumption , 2013 .

[15]  P. Williams,et al.  Overweight consumers' salient beliefs on omega-3-enriched functional foods in Australia's Illawarra region. , 2005, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[16]  David Uzzell,et al.  Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[17]  E. Kals,et al.  Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature , 1999 .

[18]  Jane Klobas,et al.  Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior , 2013 .

[19]  Wesley P. Schultz,et al.  Empathizing With Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[20]  R. Gifford,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior : Predicting the Use of Public Transportation ' , 2002 .

[21]  J. Swim,et al.  Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[22]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence. , 1999 .

[23]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[24]  C. Klöckner A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis , 2013 .

[25]  V. Ambartsumian Twenty Years After. , 1959, California medicine.

[26]  Chenyang Xiao,et al.  Gender differences in environmental behaviors in China , 2010 .

[27]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[28]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[29]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses , 2010, Journal of mixed methods research.

[30]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When Norms Do and Do not Affect Behavior , 2000 .

[31]  Tania Signal,et al.  Empathy and attitudes to animals , 2005 .

[32]  J. Berenguer,et al.  The Effect of Empathy in Proenvironmental Attitudes and Behaviors , 2007 .

[33]  F. Chen Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[34]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[35]  D. Altman,et al.  Missing data , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2011 .

[37]  S. Clayton,et al.  The psychological impacts of global climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[38]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[39]  Lyn Littlefield,et al.  IAAP Handbook of Applied Psychology , 2011 .

[40]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms , 2009 .

[41]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[42]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  Item Imputation Without Specifying Scale Structure , 2010 .

[43]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[44]  Stephen Sterling,et al.  Learning for resilience, or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education , 2010 .

[45]  Richard Cooke,et al.  Using the theory of planned behaviour to understand binge drinking: the importance of beliefs for developing interventions. , 2012, British journal of health psychology.

[46]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[47]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .

[48]  Brenton M. Wiernik,et al.  Age and environmental sustainability: a meta-analysis , 2013 .

[49]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Gender Differences in Psychosocial Determinants of University Students’ Intentions to Buy Fair Trade Products , 2014, Journal of Consumer Policy.

[50]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Missing Data in Educational Research: A Review of Reporting Practices and Suggestions for Improvement , 2004 .

[51]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behaviour , 2012 .

[52]  V. Noreika,et al.  Environmental Psychology , 2018 .

[53]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares , 2015, Health psychology review.

[54]  Lynnette Zelezny,et al.  New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism , 2000 .

[55]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[56]  A. McCright,et al.  A Test of the Biographical Availability Argument for Gender Differences in Environmental Behaviors , 2014 .

[57]  Fadia Nasser,et al.  The Effect of Using Item Parcels on Ad Hoc Goodness-of-Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Example Using Sarason's Reactions to Tests , 2003 .

[58]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach , 2009 .

[59]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[60]  Jan Činčera,et al.  Eco-Schools: what factors influence pupils' action competence for pro-environmental behaviour? , 2013 .

[61]  F. Mayer,et al.  The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature ☆ , 2004 .

[62]  G. Antonides,et al.  The self‐regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt in a sustainable and healthy consumption context , 2014 .

[63]  R. Kityo,et al.  Cultivating youth's capacity to address climate change in Uganda. , 2013 .

[64]  C. Batson,et al.  Empathy, Attitudes, and Action: Can Feeling for a Member of a Stigmatized Group Motivate One to Help the Group? , 2002 .

[65]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[66]  S. Finney,et al.  Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling , 2001 .