On efficiency and validity of previous Homeplug MAC performance analysis

The Medium Access Control protocol of Power Line Communication networks (defined in Homeplug and IEEE 1901 standards) has received relatively modest attention from the research community. As a consequence, there is only one analytical model that complies with the standardised MAC procedures and considers unsaturated conditions. We identify two important limitations of the existing analytical model: high computational expense and predicted results just prior to the predicted saturation point do not correspond to long-term network performance. In this work, we present a simplification of the previously defined analytical model of Homeplug MAC able to substantially reduce its complexity and demonstrate that the previous performance results just before predicted saturation correspond to a transitory phase. We determine that the causes of previous misprediction are common analytical assumptions and the potential occurrence of a transitory phase, that we show to be of extremely long duration under certain circumstances. We also provide techniques, both analytical and experimental, to correctly predict long-term behaviour and analyse the effect of specific Homeplug/IEEE 1901 features on the magnitude of misprediction errors. Our simplified analysis is then used to model the priority resolution scheme defined in Homeplug/IEEE 1901. We show that previous tendencies found in simulations and in an off-the-shelf testbed are correctly captured in our framework. We also show that resorting to the traffic differentiation provided by the different contention parameters alone solves the starvation faced by lower-access category traffic.