Direction-specific fMRI adaptation reveals the visual cortical network underlying the “Rotating Snakes” illusion

The "Rotating Snakes" figure elicits a clear sense of anomalous motion in stationary repetitive patterns. We used an event-related fMRI adaptation paradigm to investigate cortical mechanisms underlying the illusory motion. Following an adapting stimulus (S1) and a blank period, a probe stimulus (S2) that elicited illusory motion either in the same or in the opposite direction was presented. Attention was controlled by a fixation task, and control experiments precluded explanations in terms of artefacts of local adaptation, afterimages, or involuntary eye movements. Recorded BOLD responses were smaller for S2 in the same direction than S2 in the opposite direction in V1-V4, V3A, and MT+, indicating direction-selective adaptation. Adaptation in MT+ was correlated with adaptation in V1 but not in V4. With possible downstream inheritance of adaptation, it is most likely that adaptation predominantly occurred in V1. The results extend our previous findings of activation in MT+ (I. Kuriki, H. Ashida, I. Murakami, and A. Kitaoka, 2008), revealing the activity of the cortical network for motion processing from V1 towards MT+. This provides evidence for the role of front-end motion detectors, which has been assumed in proposed models of the illusion.

[1]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[2]  T. Albright.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  M. Landy,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  John Fox,et al.  TEACHER'S CORNER: Structural Equation Modeling With the sem Package in R , 2006 .

[6]  H. Ashida,et al.  FMRI adaptation reveals separate mechanisms for first-order and second-order motion. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Jonas Larsson,et al.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  J. Movshon,et al.  Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  The influence of fixational eye movements on the response of neurons in area MT of the macaque , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[10]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  fMRI and its interpretations: an illustration on directional selectivity in area V5/MT , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[12]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[14]  J. Hennig,et al.  The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Eye movements during fixation as velocity noise in minimum motion detection , 2010 .

[17]  K. Fujii,et al.  Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..

[18]  Shuichiro Taya,et al.  Shrinkage in the Apparent Size of Cylindrical Objects , 2007, Perception.

[19]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Visual jitter: evidence for visual-motion-based compensation of retinal slip due to small eye movements , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  I. Murakami,et al.  A positive correlation between fixation instability and the strength of illusory motion in a static display , 2006, Vision Research.

[21]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  A Motion Illusion Reveals Mechanisms of Perceptual Stabilization , 2008, PloS one.

[22]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[23]  G. Orban,et al.  Velocity sensitivity and direction selectivity of neurons in areas V1 and V2 of the monkey: influence of eccentricity. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  A jitter after-effect reveals motion-based stabilization of vision , 1998, Nature.

[25]  Georgios A Keliris,et al.  Neurons in macaque area V4 acquire directional tuning after adaptation to motion stimuli , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Contribution of inhibitory mechanisms to direction selectivity and response normalization in macaque middle temporal area. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[28]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Neuroimaging of direction-selective mechanisms for second-order motion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  I. Murakami.  Correlations between fixation stability and visual motion sensitivity , 2004, Vision Research.

[31]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal Basis of the Motion Aftereffect Reconsidered , 2001, Neuron.

[32]  Cornelia Fermüller,et al.  Illusory motion due to causal time filtering , 2010 .

[33]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[34]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[35]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Functional brain imaging of the Rotating Snakes illusion by fMRI. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[36]  Angelika Lingnau,et al.  Selective visual responses to expansion and rotation in the human MT complex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  Angelika Lingnau,et al.  Speed encoding in human visual cortex revealed by fMRI adaptation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[38]  Akiyoshi Kitaoka,et al.  Phenomenal characteristics of the peripheral drift illusion , 2003 .

[39]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  Jocelyn Faubert,et al.  The Peripheral Drift Illusion: A Motion Illusion in the Visual Periphery , 1999, Perception.

[41]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity of human visual cortical areas to the stereoscopic depth of a moving stimulus. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[42]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  The effects of eccentricity and retinal illuminance on the illusory motion seen in a stationary luminance gradient , 2008, Vision Research.

[43]  J. Movshon,et al.  Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque , 2003, Neuron.

[44]  Benjamin T Backus,et al.  Illusory motion from change over time in the response to contrast and luminance. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[45]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Spatiotemporal Frequency and Direction Sensitivities of Human Visual Areas Measured Using fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[46]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Neural Basis for a Powerful Static Motion Illusion , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Rolfs.  Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way , 2009, Vision Research.

[48]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[49]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .