Discrete event versus continuous approach to reproduction in structured population dynamics.

The governing equations are derived for the dynamics of a population consisting of organisms which reproduce by laying one egg at the time, on the basis of a simple physiological model for the uptake and use of energy. Two life stages are assumed, the egg and the adult stage where the adults do not grow. These assumptions hold true, for instance, for rotifers. From the model for the life history of the individuals, a physiologically structured population model for a rotifer population is derived. On the basis of this discrete event reproduction population model a continuous reproduction population model is proposed. The population model together with the equation for the food result in chemostat equations which are solved numerically. We show that for the calculation of the transient population dynamic behaviour after a step-wise change of the dilution rate, an age structure suffices, despite the size and energy structure used to describe the dynamics of the individuals. Aggregation of the continuous reproduction population model yields an approximate lumped parameter model in terms of delay differential equations. In order to assess the performance of the models, experimental data from the literature are fitted. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the consequences of discrete event versus continuous reproduction. In both population models death by starvation is taken into account. Unlike the continuous reproduction model, the discrete model captures the experimentally observed lack of egg production shortly after the step change in the dilution rate of the chemostat.

[1]  Yoh Iwasa,et al.  Aggregation in Model Ecosystems II. Approximate Aggregation , 1989 .

[2]  William Gurney,et al.  The systematic formulation of population models for insects with dynamically varying instar duration , 1983 .

[3]  Pierre Auger,et al.  Aggregation and emergence in systems of ordinary differential equations , 1998 .

[4]  Johan A. J. Metz,et al.  Population models incorporating physiological structure: a quick survey of the basic concepts and an application to size-structured population dynamics in waterfleas , 1988 .

[5]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Aggregation in model ecosystems. I. Perfect aggregation , 1987 .

[6]  Thomas C. Gard Aggregation in stochastic ecosystem models , 1988 .

[7]  Linear aggregation and separability of models in ecology , 1984 .

[8]  S. Levin Lectu re Notes in Biomathematics , 1983 .

[9]  William Gurney,et al.  The systematic formulation of tractable single-species models incorporating age structure , 1983 .

[10]  L. Murphy A nonlinear growth mechanism in size structured population dynamics , 1983 .

[11]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Dynamic Energy Budgets in Biological Systems: Theory and Applications in Ecotoxicology , 1993 .

[12]  A. De Roos,et al.  Numerical methods for structured population models: The Escalator Boxcar Train , 1988 .

[13]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Existence and Stability of Microbial Prey-Predator Systems , 1994 .

[14]  William Gurney,et al.  Fluctuation periodicity, generation separation, and the expression of larval competition , 1985 .

[15]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Population dynamics of rotifers in chemostats , 1997 .

[16]  M. Boraas Population dynamics of food‐limited rotifers in two‐stage chemostat culture1,2 , 1983 .

[17]  D. Sulsky,et al.  Numerical solution of structured population models , 1993, Journal of mathematical biology.