Water Footprint of Bio-energy and other primary energy carriers

Freshwater is essential for life on earth, not only for basic human needs such as food, fibre and drinking water, but also for a healthy environment. In the near future, important challenges are to meet basic needs and to ensure that the extraction of water does not affect freshwater ecosystems. At present, humanity already uses 26 percent of the total terrestrial evapotranspiration and 54 percent of accessible runoff. If the world population increases further, there is concern in several regions and countries with limited water resources if food and fibre needs of future generations can be met. In general, global change is often considered in relation to climate change caused by emissions of greenhouse gasses, such as CO2 from fossil energy carriers. A shift towards CO2-neutral energy carriers, such as biomass, is heavily promoted. Nowadays, the production of biomass for food and fibre in agriculture requires about 86% of the worldwide freshwater use often competing with other uses such as urban supply and industrial activities. A shift from fossil energy towards energy from biomass puts additional pressure on freshwater resources. This report assesses the water footprint (WF) of bio-energy and other primary energy carriers. It focuses on primary energy carriers and expresses the WF as the amount of water consumed to produce a unit of energy (m3/GJ). The report observes large differences among the WF’s for specific types of primary energy carriers. For the fossil energy carriers, the WF increases in the following order: uranium (0.09 m3/GJ), natural gas (0.11 m3/GJ), coal (0.16 m3/GJ), and finally crude oil (1.06 m3/GJ). Renewable energy carriers show large differences in their WF. The WF for wind energy is negligible, for solar thermal energy 0.30 m3/GJ, but for hydropower 22.3 m3/GJ. For biomass, the WF depends on crop type, agricultural production system and climate. The WF of average biomass grown in the Netherlands is 24 m3/GJ, in the US 58 m3/GJ, in Brazil 61 m3/GJ, and in Zimbabwe 143 m3/GJ. Based on the average per capita energy use in western societies (100 GJ/capita/year), a mix from coal, crude oil, natural gas and uranium requires about 35 m3/capita/year. If the same amount of energy is generated through the growth of biomass in a high productive agricultural system, as applied in the Netherlands, the WF is 2420 m3. The WF of biomass is 70 to 400 times larger than the WF of the other primary energy carriers (excluding hydropower). The trend towards larger energy use in combination with increasing contribution of energy from biomass to supply will bring with it a need for more water. This causes competition with other claims, such as water for food crops.

[1]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Saving water through global trade , 2005 .

[2]  Sanderine Nonhebel.  ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY IN BIOMASS PRODUCTION SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[3]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Water neutral: reducing and offsetting the impacts of water footprints , 2008 .

[4]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Business water footprint accounting: a tool to assess how production of goods and services impacts on freshwater resources worldwide , 2008 .

[5]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade , 2008 .

[6]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of cotton consumption , 2005 .

[7]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Food consumption patterns and their effect on water requirement in China , 2008 .

[8]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Human appropriation of natural capital: Comparing ecological footprint and water footprint analysis , 2007 .

[9]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[10]  H. Daly,et al.  Natural Capital and Sustainable Development , 1992 .

[11]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Going against the flow: A critical analysis of virtual water trade in the context of India's National River Linking Programme , 2007 .

[12]  Herry Rachmadyanto,et al.  UNESCO-IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION , 2010 .

[13]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Water footprints of nations , 2004 .

[14]  J. Bruinsma.  World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030: An Fao Perspective , 2002 .

[15]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Calculation methods to assess the value of upstream water flows and storage as a function of downstream benefits , 2002 .

[16]  E. Nieuwlaar,et al.  Introduction to Energy Analysis , 2008 .

[17]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[18]  I. Shiklomanov.  Appraisal and Assessment of World Water Resources , 2000 .

[19]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Human Appropriation of Renewable Fresh Water , 1996, Science.

[20]  S. Postel.  Entering an era of water scarcity: the challenges ahead. , 2000 .

[21]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[22]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern , 2006 .

[23]  Guenther Fischer,et al.  Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century , 2002 .

[24]  A. S. uiterkamp,et al.  Green Households? Domestic Consumers, Environment and Sustainability , 1997 .

[25]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources , 2008 .

[26]  F. W. T. Penning De Vries,et al.  Modeling of Growth and Production , 1983 .

[27]  B. Habekotté.  Indentification of strong and weak yield determining components of winter oilseed rape compared with winter wheat , 1997 .

[28]  Sanderine Nonhebel,et al.  Critical water requirements for food, methodology and policy consequences for food security , 2004 .

[29]  Malin Falkenmark,et al.  Assessing the water challenge of a new green revolution in developing countries , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  F. N. Teixeira,et al.  Cogeneration potential in the Columbian palm oil industry: Three case studies , 2007 .

[31]  M. Lewis,et al.  Water and Energy , 2006 .

[32]  H. Moll,et al.  Pursuing More Sustainable Consumption by Analyzing Household Metabolism in European Countries and Cities , 2005 .

[33]  H. Savenije.  Why water is not an ordinary economic good, or why the girl is special , 2002 .

[34]  H. Berge,et al.  Simulation of Ecophysiological Processes of Growth in Several Annual Crops , 1989 .

[35]  A. Bates.  Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources ‐ By Arjen Y Hoekstra and Ashok K Chapagain , 2009 .

[36]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water value-flow concept , 2003 .

[37]  The Water Footprints of Morocco and the Netherlands , 2006 .

[38]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  The global dimension of water governance: Nine reasons for global arrangements in order to cope with local water problems , 2006 .

[39]  Popkje Winfrieda Leenes.  Natural resource use for food : land, water and energy in production and consumption systems , 2006 .

[40]  Akhtar Naveed,et al.  AGRO-PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF SPRING SOWN SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) TO VARIOUS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES , 2004 .

[41]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass, and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower , 2005 .

[42]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Global water governance: Conceptual design of global institutional arrangements , 2008 .

[43]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Renewable energy sources: Their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: An integrated approach , 2007 .

[44]  A. Hoekstra.  Virtual water trade : A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade , 2003 .

[45]  P. Gerbens-Leenes,et al.  Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food , 2002 .

[46]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  A river basin as a common-pool resource: a case study for the Jaguaribe basin in Brazil , 2007 .