Static valuation of combat force potential by the analytic hierarchy process

A hierarchical weapon systems valuation model framework is discussed and the applicability of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in establishing relative values of military weapon systems is investigated. The model is a modified version of the weapon effectiveness index/weighted unit value method (WEI/WUV), a conventional method of static valuation of ground weapon systems as well as a combat unit's force potential. The hierarchical structures gives some unique features to the application of AHP. A calibration study for the model with AHP-based pairwise comparisons has been conducted for some weapon systems in Korea. Its results confirm the applicability and practicality of the 1-9 scale AHP by group judgments in measuring the relative values of weapons. >

[1]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Reply to “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” by J. S. Dyer , 1990 .

[2]  V. Belton.  A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function , 1986 .

[3]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Nuclear balance and the parity index: The role of intangibles in decisions , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Priority setting in complex problems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  J. Dyer.  Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[6]  P. Harker.  Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[7]  P. Harker.  Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[8]  T. L. Saaty.  A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[9]  J. Aczél,et al.  On synthesis of judgements , 1986 .

[10]  T. Saaty.  An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .

[11]  Thomas R. Stewart,et al.  A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective descriptions of judgmental policy , 1975 .

[12]  C. C. Waid,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models , 1982 .

[13]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[14]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Hierarchical analysis of behavior in competition: Prediction in chess , 1980 .

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[16]  James G. Taylor.  A Lanchester‐type aggregated‐force model of conventional ground combat , 1983 .

[17]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .