Offshore Aquaculture: I Know It When I See It

Offshore aquaculture is increasingly viewed as a mechanism to meet growing protein demand for seafood, while minimizing adverse consequences on the environment and other uses in the oceans. However, despite growing interest in offshore aquaculture, there appears to be no consensus as to what measures commonly define an offshore site or how effects of offshore aquaculture – relative to more nearshore practices – are assessed. This lack of agreement on what constitutes offshore aquaculture has the potential to convolute communication, create uncertainty in regulatory processes, and impede understanding of the ecological implications of offshore farming. To begin addressing these issues, we reviewed and analyzed biologically-focused primary and gray literature (Ntotal = 70) that categorize and quantify characteristics of offshore aquaculture from around the world. We found that many ‘offshore’ descriptions are relatively close to shore (< 3 nm) and significantly shallower (minimum depth ≤ 30 m) than may be assumed. We also uncovered an overall lack of consistent reporting of even the most common location-focused metrics (distance from shore, depth, current), a dearth of impact related studies (n = 17), and narrow scope of the studies themselves (i.e., 82% nutrient pollution). Of the finite subset of articles that investigated negative ecological impacts of offshore aquaculture, we found the probability of any measurable impact from an offshore farm appears to significantly decrease with distance from the farm (probability of measurable response at 90 m ± SE = 0.01 ± 0.03). Such general, but informative points of reference could be more robustly quantified with better systematic and standardized reporting of physical farm characteristics and a broader scope of ecological investigation into the effects of marine aquaculture. With offshore aquaculture still in its infancy, consistent metrics are needed for a comparable framework to guide sustainable offshore aquaculture research and development globally.

[1]  B. Halpern,et al.  Public Perceptions of Aquaculture: Evaluating Spatiotemporal Patterns of Sentiment around the World , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Provenance of global seafood , 2016 .

[3]  U. R. Sumaila,et al.  Fishing for the future: An overview of challenges and opportunities , 2016 .

[4]  Halley E. Froehlich,et al.  Synthesis and comparative analysis of physiological tolerance and life-history growth traits of marine aquaculture species , 2016 .

[5]  K. Black,et al.  Marine cage culture and the environment: effects on water quality and primary production , 2015 .

[6]  R. Naylor,et al.  Searching for Solutions in Aquaculture: Charting a Sustainable Course , 2012 .

[7]  B. H. Buck,et al.  Health and growth performance of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.) from two hanging cultivation sites in the German Bight: a nearshore—offshore comparison , 2012, Aquaculture International.

[8]  Ólafur Ögmundarson,et al.  Offshore aquaculture farming. Report from the initial feasibility study and market requirements for the innovations from the project , 2011 .

[9]  Mark J. Kaiser,et al.  A review of the feasibility, costs, and benefits of platform-based open ocean aquaculture in the Gulf of Mexico , 2011 .

[10]  B. Nowak,et al.  Moving Cages Further Offshore: Effects on Southern Bluefin Tuna, T. maccoyii, Parasites, Health and Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  D. Little,et al.  Aquaculture: global status and trends , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  M. Holmer.  Environmental issues of fish farming in offshore waters: perspectives, concerns and research needs. , 2010 .

[13]  C. Marco-Méndez,et al.  Remote influence of off-shore fish farm waste on Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadows. , 2010, Marine environmental research.

[14]  A. Farrell,et al.  Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  C. Nash,et al.  Better Management Practices for Net‐Pen Aquaculture , 2009 .

[16]  J. Borg,et al.  Monitoring of Environmental Impacts of Marine Aquaculture , 2008 .

[17]  B. Belton,et al.  Offshore Aquaculture: The Frontier of Redefining Oceanic Property , 2007 .

[18]  Bryan M. Dewsbury,et al.  Marine ecosystem‐based management: from characterization to implementation , 2006 .

[19]  S. Vizzini,et al.  The effects of anthropogenic organic matter inputs on stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes in organisms from different trophic levels in a southern Mediterranean coastal area. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Bela H. Buck,et al.  Response of offshore cultivated Laminaria saccharina to hydrodynamic forcing in the North Sea , 2005 .

[21]  Rex Dalton,et al.  Aquaculture: Fishing for trouble , 2004, Nature.

[22]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[23]  L. Robaina,et al.  A comparative study of sediments under a marine cage farm at Gran Canaria Island (Spain). Preliminary results , 2001 .

[24]  R. Spieler,et al.  Biological Assessment of Artificial Reef Materials: Concrete Aggregates and Quarry Stone. Proceedings of the 53rd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute , 2000 .

[25]  R. Wu.  The environmental impact of marine fish culture: Towards a sustainable future , 1995 .

[26]  Vivian Wing-Wah Yam,et al.  Impact of marine fish farming on water quality and bottom sediment: A case study in the sub-tropical environment , 1994 .

[27]  Hwung-Hweng Hwung,et al.  On a wave dissipation method for offshore aquaculture areas , 1986 .