Constant motion, acceleration, vibration, and rotation of objects in SAR data

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) provides high resolution images of static ground scenes, but processing of data containing moving objects results in varying phase and amplitude effects. The work at hand illustrates via theoretical considerations and concrete simulations what happens to SAR imagery when parts of a scene are not static. We differentiate between four types of motion. Objects moving with a constant velocity cause position errors in azimuth as well as target defocusing and smearing in azimuth and range. Accelerating objects are responsible for even stronger shift and defocusing effects since the position errors are now a function of time. Closely related are vibrations of an object. They may be interpreted as a regular and continuous de- and acceleration whose range component results in so-called paired echoes on each side of an object in azimuth. Finally, rotation as an extreme example of constant radial acceleration may disturb a SAR image over a wide area. Through a thorough motion analysis, we developed a flexible SAR raw data simulator. Our simulations of point scatterers in raw data are based on the radar radiation pattern as a function of the system carrier frequency and the relative positions between the radar and each scatterer. All four types of movement described above may be expressed as varying relative positions and Doppler frequency shifts due to instantaneous phase variations. The standard SAR processing steps of range and azimuth compression for the simulated data provide impressive results for freely adaptable system parameters of the movement and of the SAR system.

[1]  Mehrdad Soumekh,et al.  Moving target detection and imaging using an X band along-track monopulse SAR , 2002 .

[2]  Alberto Moreira,et al.  Extended chirp scaling algorithm for air- and spaceborne SAR data processing in stripmap and ScanSAR imaging modes , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Giorgio Franceschetti,et al.  SARAS: a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) raw signal simulator , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Richard Bamler,et al.  A comparison of range-Doppler and wavenumber domain SAR focusing algorithms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Delphine Cerutti-Maori,et al.  First Experimental SCAN / MTI Results Achieved With the Multi-Channel SAR-System PAMIR , 2004 .

[6]  Julian Holtzman,et al.  Radar Image Simulation , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[7]  Trygve Sparr,et al.  Analysis of phase modulation caused by target motion in SAR images , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  R. Keith Raney,et al.  Precision SAR processing using chirp scaling , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  R. Sullivan Microwave Radar Imaging And Advanced Concepts , 2000 .

[10]  Sune R. J. Axelsson Position correction of moving targets in SAR imagery , 2004, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[11]  T. Sparr,et al.  Micro-Doppler analysis of vibrating targets in SAR , 2003 .

[12]  J.H.G. Ender Space-time processing for multichannel synthetic aperture radar , 1999 .

[13]  W. Carrara,et al.  Spotlight synthetic aperture radar : signal processing algorithms , 1995 .

[14]  R. Keith Raney,et al.  Synthetic Aperture Imaging Radar and Moving Targets , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[15]  M. J. Collins,et al.  SIMULATION OF SAR SIGNALS FROM MOVING VEHICLES ( FOCUSING ACCELERATING GROUND MOVING TARGETS ) , 2004 .

[16]  D. Schleher Mti and Pulsed Doppler Radar , 1999 .

[17]  Trygve Sparr,et al.  Oscillating targets in airborne SAR images , 2003, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[18]  A. Beaudoin,et al.  An airborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) experiment to support RADARSAT-2 ground moving target indication (GMTI) , 2002 .