Usability evaluation with screen reader users: a video presentation of the PCTA’s experimental setting and rules

In the study entitled “Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: Implementation of the Partial Concurrent Thinking Aloud technique” (Federici et al. 2010), we have proposed a modified protocol of usability evaluation technique for blind users, which integrates the features of the concurrent and the retrospective techniques. This new technique, called partial concurrent thinking aloud (PCTA), while respecting the properties of classic verbal protocols, overcomes the structural interference and the limits of concurrent and retrospective protocols when used with screen reader users. In order to facilitate understanding and acquisition of the PCTA’s technique for practitioners and researchers, we have video recorded three different verbal protocols by visualizing five experimental sections. In the first two videos, we have compared a concurrent with a retrospective’s verbal protocol of a sighted user, showing the difference of the verbalizations provided by the user in these two conditions. The third video shows the structural interference of the screen reader, during a blind user concurrent thinking aloud. In the last two videos, we show the difference of a blind user behaviour when PCTA or retrospective protocol is adopted. The videos clearly visualize the advantage of the PCTA use in respect of the two other protocols. In conclusion, the visualization of the PCTA technique confirms that this new verbal protocol promotes and guarantees a more user-driven usability assessment with disabled people, by better involving screen reader users, overcoming the structural interference and the limits of the concurrent and retrospective protocols.

[1]  Jacques Leplat,et al.  Evaluation of Different Modalities of Verbalization in a Sorting Task , 1983, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[2]  Zhiwei Guan,et al.  The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking , 2006, CHI.

[3]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability , 2007, TCHI.

[4]  Stefano Federici,et al.  The partial concurrent thinking aloud: A new usability evaluation technique for blind users , 2009 .

[5]  Stefano Federici,et al.  Web usability evaluation with screen reader users: implementation of the partial concurrent thinking aloud technique , 2010, Cognitive Processing.

[6]  Pallab Paul,et al.  A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. , 2000, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  Susan Kemper,et al.  The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[8]  Victoria A. Bowers Concurrent versus Retrospective Verbal Protocol for Comparing Window Usability , 1990 .

[9]  E. C. Cmm,et al.  on the Recognition of Speech, with , 2008 .

[10]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[11]  A. Dawn Shaikh,et al.  Thinking but not seeing: think-aloud for non-sighted users , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.