Sources of variability in rodent carcinogenicity studies.

A number of factors may influence tumor rates in rodent carcinogenicity studies, including the animal room environment, genetic differences, food consumption/weight gain, survival/age of the animals, identification of gross lesions, pathology sampling procedures and preparation of the histology slides, and histopathologic diagnosis. The relative importance of these factors is evaluated, making use of laboratory animal carcinogenicity data from the National Toxicology Program and from other sources. An investigator must be aware of these potentially confounding factors, so that appropriate measures can be taken to reduce or eliminate their impact on the interpretation of study results. Certain potential sources of within-study variability can be controlled by appropriate experimental design and by proper conduct according to standard operating procedures. The effect of certain factors influencing tumor prevalence may be magnified when variability from study to study is considered, and thus it may be difficult to formulate a biologically meaningful statistical analysis that uses historical control data in a formal testing framework.

[1]  M. D. Reuber Carcinogenicity and toxicity of malathion and malaoxon. , 1985, Environmental research.

[2]  L. Golberg,et al.  Factors affecting spontaneous tumor incidence rates in mice: a literature review. , 1984, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[3]  G. Boorman,et al.  Proliferative lesions of the exocrine pancreas: relationship to corn oil gavage in the National Toxicology Program. , 1985, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  J K Haseman,et al.  Natural history of body weight gain, survival, and neoplasia in the F344 rat. , 1984, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  Joseph K. Haseman,et al.  Use of Historical Control Data in Carcinogenicity Studies in Rodents , 1984, Toxicologic pathology.

[6]  C. Schiller,et al.  Comparative toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in four (sub)strains of adult male rats. , 1985, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[7]  R. Smythe,et al.  Statistical Tests with Historical Controls , 1988 .

[8]  N. Mantel,et al.  Use of logrank scores in the analysis of litter-matched data on time to tumor appearance. , 1979, Cancer Research.

[9]  R. Doll,et al.  The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. , 1981, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  J K Haseman,et al.  Growth, Body Weight, Survival, and Tumor Trends in F344/N Rats during an Eleven-Year Period , 1990, Toxicologic pathology.

[11]  J K Haseman,et al.  Patterns of tumor incidence in two-year cancer bioassay feeding studies in Fischer 344 rats. , 1983, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[12]  Taskforceofpastpresidents Animal data in hazard evaluation: paths and pitfalls. , 1982, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  S. S. Young,et al.  Are there local room effects on hepatic tumors in male mice? an examination of the NTP eugenol study , 1987 .

[14]  J. Haseman,et al.  Influence of viral infections on body weight, survival, and tumor prevalence of B6C3F1 ( C57BL 6N × C3H HeN) mice in carcinogenicity studies , 1989 .

[15]  J K Haseman,et al.  Use of dual control groups to estimate false positive rates in laboratory animal carcinogenicity studies. , 1986, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[16]  R. Kodell,et al.  Influence of cage shelf level on retinal atrophy in mice. , 1982, Laboratory animal science.

[17]  VINYL CHLORIDE: A MODEL CARCINOGEN FOR RISK ASSESSMENT , 1982 .

[18]  G A Boorman,et al.  Neoplasms observed in untreated and corn oil gavage control groups of F344/N rats and (C57BL/6N X C3H/HeN)F1 (B6C3F1) mice. , 1985, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  J. Haseman,et al.  Statistical issues in the design, analysis and interpretation of animal carcinogenicity studies. , 1984, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  D. Krewski,et al.  Long-term toxicity of hexachlorobenzene in the rat and the effect of dietary vitamin A. , 1985, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[21]  G. Conybeare Effect of quality and quantity of diet on survival and tumour incidence in outbred Swiss mice. , 1980, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[22]  J. Haseman Lack of Cage Effects on Liver Tumor Incidence in B6C3F1 Mice , 1988 .

[23]  T. Fears,et al.  False-positive and false-negative rates for carcinogenicity screens. , 1977, Cancer research.

[24]  J. Haseman,et al.  Influence of body weight on the incidence of spontaneous tumors in rats and mice of long-term studies. , 1987, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[25]  J M Ward,et al.  Variability in the rates of some common naturally occurring tumors in Fischer 344 rats and (C57BL/6N x C3H/HeN)F1 (B6C3F1) mice. , 1981, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  E. Sigg,et al.  Endocrine factors in isolation-induced aggressiveness in rodents. , 1966, Endocrinology.

[27]  R. Tamura,et al.  The incorporation of historical control information in tests of proportions: simulation study of Tarone's procedure. , 1986, Biometrics.

[28]  F. Mosteller,et al.  A case study of statistics in the regulatory process: the FD&C Red No. 40 experiments. , 1981, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[29]  N Mantel,et al.  Mantel-Haenszel analyses of litter-matched time-to-response data, with modifications for recovery of interlitter information. , 1977, Cancer research.

[30]  R L Kodell,et al.  Association between cage shelf level and spontaneous and induced neoplasms in mice. , 1984, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[31]  T. Fears,et al.  Exact significance levels for multiple binomial testing with application to carcinogenicity screens. , 1981, Biometrics.

[32]  J K Haseman,et al.  Do cage effects influence tumor incidence? An examination of laboratory animal carcinogenicity studies utilizing fischer 344 rats , 1988, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[33]  A. Hatch,et al.  Isolation syndrome in the rat. , 1965, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[34]  R. Bates,et al.  Malathion and malaoxon: histopathology reexamination of the National Cancer Institute's carcinogenesis studies. , 1985, Environmental research.

[35]  J J Gart,et al.  Statistical issues in interpretation of chronic bioassay tests for carcinogenicity. , 1979, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[36]  M. H. Ross,et al.  Lasting influence of early caloric restriction on prevalence of neoplasms in the rat. , 1971, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  K S Crump,et al.  Exact statistical tests for any carcinogenic effect in animal bioassays. , 1988, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[38]  M. H. Ross,et al.  Influence of protein and caloric intake upon spontaneous tumor incidence of the anterior pituitary gland of the rat. , 1970, The Journal of nutrition.

[39]  K. Prasse,et al.  Microscopic evaluation of veterinary pathology slides. , 1986, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[40]  J. Haseman,et al.  The effect of age and exposure duration on cancer induction by a known carcinogen in rats, mice, and hamsters. , 1983, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[41]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  The genesis and growth of tumors. V. Effects of varying the level of B vitamins in the diet. , 1952, Cancer research.

[42]  F. M. Garner,et al.  Comparison of neoplasms in six sources of rats. , 1973, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.