Software for illustrative presentation of basic clinical characteristics of laboratory tests--GraphROC for Windows.

GraphROC for Windows is a program for clinical test evaluation. It was designed for the handling of large datasets obtained from clinical laboratory databases. In the user interface, graphical and numerical presentations are combined. For simplicity, numerical data is not shown unless requested. Relevant numbers can be "picked up" from the graph by simple mouse operations. Reference distributions can be displayed by using automatically optimized bin widths. Any percentile of the distribution with corresponding confidence limits can be chosen for display. In sensitivity-specificity analysis, both illness- and health-related distributions are shown in the same graph. The following data for any cutoff limit can be shown in a separate click window: clinical sensitivity and specificity with corresponding confidence limits, positive and negative likelihood ratios, positive and negative predictive values and efficiency. Predictive values and clinical efficiency of the cutoff limit can be updated for any prior probability of disease. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves can be generated and combined into the same graph for comparison of several different tests. The area under the curve with corresponding confidence interval is calculated for each ROC curve. Numerical results of analyses and graphs can be printed or exported to other Microsoft Windows programs. GraphROC for Windows also employs a new method, developed by us, for the indirect estimation of health-related limits and change limits from mixed distributions of clinical laboratory data.

[1]  I. Bojesen,et al.  Evaluation of the chemical parameters of four systems of radioimmunological assay. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[2]  T Koivula,et al.  Reference intervals developed from data for hospitalized patients: computerized method based on combination of laboratory and diagnostic data. , 1994, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  N. Tietz Accuracy in clinical chemistry--does anybody care? , 1994, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  T. Blundell,et al.  Multidisciplinary cycles for protein engineering: site-directed mutagenesis and X-ray structural studies of aspartic proteinases. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[5]  B. Hsi,et al.  Indirect methods for estimating the normal range. , 1969, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  L. Voipio‐Pulkki,et al.  Method for determining reference changes from patients' serial data: example of cardiac enzymes. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[7]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  W. Oosterhuis,et al.  Reference Values: Bhattacharya or the Method Proposed by the Ifcc? , 1990, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[9]  R. Kay,et al.  Applied Statistics. A Handbook of Techniques. 5th ed. , 1984 .

[10]  Hoffmann Rg,et al.  A NEW SCALE OF NORMAL VALUES FOR PHYSICIANS. , 1964 .

[11]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[12]  J. Pryce Level of haemoglobin in whole blood and red blood-cells, and proposed convention for defining normality. , 1960, Lancet.

[13]  F W Sunderman,et al.  Current concepts of "normal values," "reference values," and "discrimination values," in clinical chemistry. , 1975, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  R. Galen,et al.  Beyond Normality: The Predictive Value and E ciency of Medical Diagnoses , 1975 .

[15]  H. Baadenhuijsen,et al.  Indirect Estimation of Clinical Chemical Reference Intervals from Total Hospital Patient Data: Application of a Modified Bhattacharya Procedure , 1985, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.

[16]  H. Fritsche,et al.  Methods for determining "reference changes" from serial measurements: plasma lipid-bound sialic acid. , 1989, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  E M Gindler,et al.  Calculation of normal ranges by methods used for resolution of overlapping Gaussian distributions. , 1970, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  R. B. Payne,et al.  Redefinition of the normal range for serum sodium. , 1968, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  J R Beck,et al.  The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. , 1986, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[20]  Kerttu Irjala,et al.  Generation of Reference Values for Cardiac Enzymes from Hospital Admission Laboratory Data , 1994, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[21]  C G Fraser,et al.  Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. , 1989, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[22]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[23]  W. Gerhardt,et al.  Evaluation of test data from clinical studies. I. Terminology, graphic interpretation, diagnostic strategies, and selection of sample groups. II. Critical review of the concepts of efficiency, receiver operated characteristics (ROC), and likelihood ratios. , 1986, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum.

[24]  M. Wellby,et al.  A comparison of conventionally derived normal ranges WITH THOSE OBTAINED FROM PATIENTS' results. , 1970, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[25]  A J Naus,et al.  The Use of Patient Data for the Calculation of Reference Values for Some Haematological Parameters , 1980, Journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry. Zeitschrift fur klinische Chemie und klinische Biochemie.