Effect of cracks and pitting defects on gear meshing

The development of vibration-based condition monitoring techniques, especially those focused on prognosis, requires the development of better computational models that enable the simulation of the vibratory behaviour of mechanical systems. Gear transmission vibrations are governed by the so-called gear mesh frequency and its harmonics, due to the variable stiffness of the meshing process. The fundamental frequency will be modulated by the appearance of defects which modify the meshing features. This study introduces an advanced model to assess the consequences of defects such as cracks and pitting on the meshing stiffness and other related parameters such as load transmission error or load sharing ratio. Meshing forces are computed by imposing the compatibility and complementarity conditions, leading to a non-linear equation system with inequality constraints. The calculation of deformations is subdivided into a global and a local type. The former is approached by a finite element model and the latter via a non-linear Herztian-based formulation. This procedure enables a reduced computational effort, in contrast to conventional finite element models with contact elements. The formulation used to include these defects is described in detail and their consequences are assessed by a quasi-static analysis of a transmission example.

[1]  Ian Howard,et al.  THE DYNAMIC MODELLING OF A SPUR GEAR IN MESH INCLUDING FRICTION AND A CRACK , 2001 .

[2]  Fakher Chaari,et al.  Analytical modelling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gearmesh stiffness , 2009 .

[3]  Ian Howard,et al.  The torsional stiffness of involute spur gears , 2004 .

[4]  Anand Parey,et al.  Spur gear dynamic models including defects: A review , 2003 .

[5]  Robert B. Randall,et al.  A New Method of Modeling Gear Faults , 1982 .

[6]  Robert G. Parker,et al.  NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A SPUR GEAR PAIR: MODELLING AND EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISONS , 2000 .

[7]  Ian Howard,et al.  Comparison of localised spalling and crack damage from dynamic modelling of spur gear vibrations , 2006 .

[8]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  The Influence of Gear Design Parameters on Gear Tooth Damage Detection Sensitivity , 2002 .

[9]  Radivoje Mitrovic,et al.  Analysis of the Nominal Load Effects on Gear Load Capacity Using the Finite-Element Method , 2010 .

[10]  Mohammad Durali,et al.  The effect of three-dimensional crack growth on the force distribution and meshing stiffness of a spur gear: Ideal and misaligned contacts , 2009 .

[11]  Ian Howard,et al.  The Dynamic Modeling of Multiple Pairs of Spur Gears in Mesh, Including Friction and Geometrical Errors , 2003 .

[12]  Joris Peeters Simulation of Dynamic Drive Train Loads in a Windturbine (Simulatie van de dynamische belasting in de aandrijflijn van een windturbine) , 2006 .

[13]  Joseph Mathew,et al.  Rotating machinery prognostics. State of the art, challenges and opportunities , 2009 .

[14]  Anand Parey,et al.  Dynamic modelling of spur gear pair and application of empirical mode decomposition-based statistical analysis for early detection of localized tooth defect , 2006 .

[15]  Mohamed Haddar,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analyses by Finite Element Method of a Spur Gear: Effect of Cracks in the Teeth Foot on the Mesh Stiffness , 2007 .

[16]  R. B. Randall,et al.  Differential diagnosis of spall versus cracks in the gear tooth fillet region , 2004 .

[17]  Donald R. Houser,et al.  Mathematical models used in gear dynamics—A review , 1988 .

[18]  Fakher Chaari,et al.  Effect of spalling or tooth breakage on gearmesh stiffness and dynamic response of a one-stage spur gear transmission , 2008 .

[19]  Anette Andersson,et al.  A method to determine dynamic loads on spur gear teeth and on bearings , 2003 .

[20]  Y. Cai,et al.  The Linear Approximated Equation of Vibration of a Pair of Spur Gears (Theory and Experiment) , 1994 .

[21]  A. Kahraman Effect of Axial Vibrations on the Dynamics of a Helical Gear Pair , 2021 .