Predicting outcome in acute cardiotoxicity based on Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and modified APACHE II score (MAS)

Introduction:  Acute cardiotoxicity patients can have adverse effects that may lead to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Because of limited ICU beds, triage and stratification of cases into different groups according to survival is a must nowadays. Many scoring systems have been  as a tool for triage and improve ICU quality management. This study aims to evaluate the role of GCS (Glasgow coma scale) and MAS (Modified Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation ) as effective scoring system in predicting mortality in acute cardiotoxicity Methods: A prospective study was carried on 100 patients with acute cardiotoxicity by drugs and toxins known to cause cardiac injury admitted to Sohag Hospitals. Results 94% of patients had survived 4 of which discharged with complication . By ROC curve analysis to assess the predictor of outcome of acute cardiovascular toxicity, it was found that MAS score at cut off value > 11.5 had sensitivity 100% and specificity 74.5%, GCS at cut off < 9.5 had sensitivity 100% and specificity 72.3%.The accuracy rate of GCS was (92.4%) while that of MAS was (90.8%). Conclusion: GCS and MAS can be used as simple predictor tools of mortality in acute cardiotoxicity. Recommendation: GCS and MAS may be used as simple triage tools in acute cardiotoxicity patients in ICU to improve quality management and utilizing hospital resources.

[1]  S. George,et al.  Evaluation of Poisoning Patterns in Aswan Governorate in the period from 1st of June 2017 to 31st of December 2017 (Prospective Study) , 2019, Zagazig Journal of Forensic Medicine.

[2]  S. H. Agwa,et al.  Plasma MiRNA-208b as a Biomarker for Detection of Cardiotoxicity Induced by Acute Cardiovascular Drugs Poisoning , 2018, Ain Shams Journal of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology.

[3]  Basheir A. Hassan,et al.  Patterns of Acute Poisoning in Childhood in Zagazig, Egypt: An Epidemiological Study , 2014, International scholarly research notices.

[4]  H. Hassanian‐Moghaddam,et al.  QT Dispersion and Prognostication of the Outcome in Acute Cardiotoxicities: A Comparison with SAPS II and APACHE II Scoring Systems , 2014, Cardiovascular Toxicology.

[5]  H. Hassanian‐Moghaddam,et al.  QT Dispersion and Prognostication of the Outcome in Acute Cardiotoxicities: A Comparison with SAPS II and APACHE II Scoring Systems , 2013, Cardiovascular Toxicology.

[6]  Ali E. Mansour,et al.  Forensic analysis of suicide mortality in Sohag governorate (Upper Egypt) in the period 2005–2009 , 2013 .

[7]  M. K. E. Masry,et al.  Annual Report of the Poison Control Centre of Ain Shams University Hospital , Cairo , Egypt , 2013 .

[8]  N. Johnson,et al.  A Review of Emergency Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Severe Poisoning by Cardiotoxic Drugs , 2012, Journal of Medical Toxicology.

[9]  Amira A. Wahdan,et al.  Study of Electrocardiographic Changes Associated with Acute Poisoning in Tanta Poison Center , 2012 .

[10]  A. Sabzghabaee,et al.  Glasgow Coma Scale and Its Components on Admission: Are They Valuable Prognostic Tools in Acute Mixed Drug Poisoning? , 2011, Critical care research and practice.

[11]  A. Sabzghabaee,et al.  Applicability of different scoring systems in outcome prediction of patients with mixed drug poisoning-induced coma , 2011, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[12]  S. Shalaby,et al.  Clinical profile of acute paraphenylenediamine intoxication in Egypt , 2010, Toxicology and industrial health.

[13]  M. Abdollahi,et al.  Successful treatment of acute aluminium phosphide poisoning: possible benefit of coconut oil , 2005, Human & experimental toxicology.

[14]  D. Bhullar,et al.  Poisoning trends in the malwa region of Punjab , 2003 .