The cocial construction of mobile telephony: an application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks

The purpose of this study was to test the argument that perceptions and uses of mobile phones are socially constructed in close personal networks. The study hypothesized that, through collective sense making, perceptions and uses of mobile phones would be more similar within 45 personal communication networks than for the entire sample of 194 individuals. Findings from a self-report survey reveal that several factors were significantly more similar within the networks than for individuals throughout the sample, including perceptions of the handset as a means of display, use for safety and security, attitudes about use in public, microcoordination, hypercoordination, and comfort with technology. Interviews were conducted to explore how perceptions and uses were shaped through relationships and interactions situated in social context. The interview data illuminate how social interaction contributed to perceptions and uses in four key areas: mobile phone adoption, attitudes about products and services, perceptions of non-normative use, and collective use. Results of the study serve as evidence supporting the argument that perceptions and uses of communication technologies are, at least in part, constructed socially among close personal contacts. This study demonstrates why it is important for researchers to consider social contacts and social contexts when examining the implications of communication technologies.

[1]  Z. Smoreda,et al.  Social networks and residential ICT adoption and use , 2001 .

[2]  Rich Ling,et al.  Nobody sits at home and waits for the telephone to ring: micro and hyper-coordination through the us , 1999 .

[3]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  Diffusion in computing networks: the case of BITNET , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[4]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Going wireless: behavior & practice of new mobile phone users , 2000, CSCW '00.

[5]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Networks: Toward a New Paradigm for Research , 1980 .

[6]  Rob Kling,et al.  Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism , 1996 .

[7]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Welcome to the wireless world: problems using and understanding mobile telephony , 2001 .

[8]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[9]  Michael B. Salwen,et al.  Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication , 2000 .

[10]  Rich Ling.  One can talk about common manners!': the use of mobile telephones in inappropriate situations , 1996 .

[11]  Berit Skog.  Mobiles and the Norwegian teen: identity, gender and class , 2002 .

[12]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[13]  L. Winner.  Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought , 1977 .

[14]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Conclusion: making meaning of mobiles - a theory of Apparatgeist , 2002 .

[15]  R. Rice,et al.  Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts , 2003 .

[16]  August E. Grant,et al.  Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging , 1990 .

[17]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[18]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Blurring the boundaries: cell phones, mobility, and the line between work and personal life , 2001 .

[19]  Ged M. Murtagh,et al.  Seeing the rules: preliminary observations of action, interaction and mobile phone use , 2001 .

[20]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[21]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[22]  Joseph W. Wenzel,et al.  Proverbs and practical reasoning: A study in socio‐logic , 1979 .

[23]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Network Community: An Introduction to Networks in the 19 Global Village , 1999 .

[24]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[25]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Mobile communications: understanding users, adoption, and design , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.