Computer-Assisted Identification of Protein Sorting Signals and Prediction of Membrane Protein Topology and Structure

Publisher Summary Many proteins contain sorting signals that serve to target them for import into different subcellular compartments. Similar signals also guide the insertion of integral membrane proteins into lipid bilayers. This chapter describes current methods for detecting such signals in amino acid sequences. Many of the functional characteristics of proteins can be correlated with more or less well-defined linear motifs in their amino acid sequences. This chapter deals with motifs that are known to be important for intracellular protein sorting, i.e., with sequence elements that serve as “address labels” and allow the cell to transport a given class of proteins to a given subcellular organelle. As it turns out, related motifs also guide membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer. In most cases, these motifs are encoded within a simple, contiguous stretch of the chain, and are thus, quite easy to identify in the primary sequence. The understanding of the signals that guide the assembly of membrane proteins is sufficiently advanced to allow quite reliable predictions of topology from sequence, at least for bacterial inner membrane proteins.

[1]  J. Hartsuck,et al.  Mapping and molecular modeling of a recognition domain for lysosomal enzyme targeting. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  G. Feher,et al.  The bacterial photosynthetic reaction center as a model for membrane proteins. , 1989, Annual review of biochemistry.

[3]  Application of three-dimensional molecular hydrophobicity potential to the analysis of spatial organization of membrane protein domains. II. Optimization of hydrophobic contacts in transmembrane hairpin structures of Na+, K+-ATPase , 1992, Journal of protein chemistry.

[4]  P. Silver How proteins enter the nucleus , 1991, Cell.

[5]  Gunnar von Heijne,et al.  The structure of signal peptides from bacterial lipoproteins. , 1989 .

[6]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Domain structure of mitochondrial and chloroplast targeting peptides. , 1989, European journal of biochemistry.

[7]  G von Heijne,et al.  Cleavage-site motifs in mitochondrial targeting peptides. , 1990, Protein engineering.

[8]  G. Rummel,et al.  Crystal structures explain functional properties of two E. coli porins , 1992, Nature.

[9]  S. Chung,et al.  Retention of a cis Golgi protein requires polar residues on one face of a predicted alpha-helix in the transmembrane domain. , 1993, Molecular biology of the cell.

[10]  C. Howe,et al.  Prediction of leader peptide cleavage sites for polypeptides of the thylakoid lumen. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  G. Heijne Mitochondrial targeting sequences may form amphiphilic helices. , 1986 .

[12]  E. Beasley,et al.  The signal that sorts yeast cytochrome b2 to the mitochondrial intermembrane space contains three distinct functional regions. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[13]  T. Rapoport Transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. , 1992, Science.

[14]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Predicting the topology of eukaryotic membrane proteins. , 1993, European journal of biochemistry.

[15]  J. Hendrick,et al.  Survey of amino-terminal proteolytic cleavage sites in mitochondrial precursor proteins: leader peptides cleaved by two matrix proteases share a three-amino acid motif. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  D. McGeoch,et al.  On the predictive recognition of signal peptide sequences. , 1985, Virus research.

[17]  S H White,et al.  Linear optimization of predictors for secondary structure. Application to transbilayer segments of membrane proteins. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  G. Schulz,et al.  Prediction of the general structure of OmpF and PhoE from the sequence and structure of porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Orientation of porin in the membrane. , 1991, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  G Schneider,et al.  Analysis of cleavage-site patterns in protein precursor sequences with a perceptron-type neural network. , 1993, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[20]  Richard Henderson,et al.  A model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high resolution electron cryomicroscopy , 1990 .

[21]  L. Gierasch,et al.  The NPXY internalization signal of the LDL receptor adopts a reverse-turn conformation , 1991, Cell.

[22]  Werner K¨hlbrandt,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of plant light-harvesting complex determined by electron crystallography , 1991, Nature.

[23]  A. Baker,et al.  The mitochondrial targeting function of randomly generated peptide sequences correlates with predicted helical amphiphilicity. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  J Edelman,et al.  Quadratic minimization of predictors for protein secondary structure. Application to transmembrane alpha-helices. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  R. Zimmermann,et al.  The reaction specificities of the thylakoidal processing peptidase and Escherichia coli leader peptidase are identical. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[26]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Chloroplast transit peptides the perfect random coil? , 1991, FEBS letters.

[27]  G. Schulz,et al.  Molecular architecture and electrostatic properties of a bacterial porin. , 1991, Science.

[28]  Amos Bairoch,et al.  The PROSITE dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins, its current status , 1993, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  S Subramani,et al.  A conserved tripeptide sorts proteins to peroxisomes , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  H. Pelham,et al.  The retention signal for soluble proteins of the endoplasmic reticulum. , 1990, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[31]  I. Shimada,et al.  N-terminal half of a mitochondrial presequence peptide takes a helical conformation when bound to dodecylphosphocholine micelles: a proton nuclear magnetic resonance study. , 1989, Journal of biochemistry.

[32]  C. J. Roberts,et al.  Membrane protein retention in the yeast Golgi apparatus: dipeptidyl aminopeptidase A is retained by a cytoplasmic signal containing aromatic residues , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[33]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Helical sidedness and the distribution of polar residues in trans-membrane helices. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  G. Schulz,et al.  The structure of porin from Rhodobacter capsulatus at 1.8 Å resolution , 1991, FEBS letters.

[35]  G. Heijne The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans‐membrane topology , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[36]  J. Richards,et al.  Amphiphilicity is essential for mitochondrial presequence function. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[37]  D. Engelman,et al.  The glycophorin A transmembrane domain dimer: sequence-specific propensity for a right-handed supercoil of helices. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[38]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. , 1988, European journal of biochemistry.

[39]  J. Rosenbusch,et al.  Folding patterns of porin and bacteriorhodopsin. , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[40]  M. Inouye,et al.  A single amino acid determinant of the membrane localization of lipoproteins in E. coli , 1988, Cell.

[41]  C DeLisi,et al.  The detection and classification of membrane-spanning proteins. , 1985, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[42]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Hydrophobicity scales and computational techniques for detecting amphipathic structures in proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  M. Kanehisa,et al.  A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells , 1992, Genomics.

[44]  G. von Heijne,et al.  A conserved cleavage‐site motif in chloroplast transit peptides , 1990, FEBS letters.

[45]  S. Cowan,et al.  Prediction of membrane‐spanning β‐strands and its application to maltoporin , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[46]  A. Driessen,et al.  The enzymology of protein translocation across the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. , 1991, Annual review of biochemistry.

[47]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[48]  T. Silhavy,et al.  Genetic analysis of protein export in Escherichia coli K12. , 1985, Annual review of biochemistry.

[49]  R. Schekman,et al.  Polypeptide translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  R. Laskey,et al.  Nuclear targeting sequences--a consensus? , 1991, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[51]  J. Gordon,et al.  Computer-assisted predictions of signal peptidase processing sites. , 1987, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[52]  R. Henderson,et al.  Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron cryo-microscopy. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  G. Vonheijne The signal peptide. , 1990 .

[54]  M. Jacobson,et al.  The uses of computer-aided signal peptide selection and polymerase chain reaction in gene construction and expression of secreted proteins. , 1990, DNA and cell biology.

[55]  J. Deisenhofer,et al.  Structures of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. , 1991, Annual review of cell biology.

[56]  C. Robinson,et al.  Transport of proteins into chloroplasts. The thylakoidal processing peptidase is a signal-type peptidase with stringent substrate requirements at the -3 and -1 positions. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[57]  S. Hurtley Golgi localization signals , 1992, Trends in Biochemical Sciences.

[58]  G. Heijne Membrane protein structure prediction. Hydrophobicity analysis and the positive-inside rule. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[59]  G. Heijne A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. , 1986 .

[60]  István Csabai,et al.  Improving signal peptide prediction accuracy by simulated neural network , 1991, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[61]  W. Neupert,et al.  Targeting of cytochrome b2 into the mitochondrial intermembrane space: specific recognition of the sorting signal. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[62]  G. Heijne,et al.  Membrane proteins: from sequence to structure. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[63]  G. Vergoten,et al.  Application of three-dimensional molecular hydrophobicity potential to the analysis of spatial organization of membrane domains in proteins: I. Hydrophobic properties of transmembrane segments of Na+, K+-ATPase , 1992, Journal of protein chemistry.

[64]  S Subramani,et al.  Targeting efficiencies of various permutations of the consensus C‐terminal tripeptide peroxisomal targeting signal , 1992, FEBS letters.

[65]  M. Kanehisa,et al.  Expert system for predicting protein localization sites in gram‐negative bacteria , 1991, Proteins.

[66]  H. Pelham,et al.  Mutational analysis of the human KDEL receptor: distinct structural requirements for Golgi retention, ligand binding and retrograde transport. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[67]  R. Efremov,et al.  Application of three-dimensional molecular hydrophobicity potential to the analysis of spatial organization of membrane domains in proteins. III. Modeling of intramembrane moiety of Na+, K+-ATPase , 1993, Journal of protein chemistry.

[68]  A. M. Popowicz,et al.  SIGSEQ: a computer program for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites , 1988, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[69]  A. Pugsley The complete general secretory pathway in gram-negative bacteria. , 1993, Microbiological reviews.

[70]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Mitochondrial targeting sequences why ‘non‐amphiphilic’ peptides may still be amphiphilic , 1988, FEBS letters.

[71]  P. Weisbeek,et al.  The transit sequence mediates the specific interaction of the precursor of ferredoxin with chloroplast envelope membrane lipids. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.