Opportunities and risks for sustainable biomass export from the south‐eastern United States to Europe

Import of wood pellets to the EU from the southeastern United States has increased almost ten‐fold over the past seven years, driven largely by mandates under the Renewable Energy Directive. While the displacement of fossil fuels with biomass can offer significant energy diversity and climate benefits, these must be balanced against the potential detriment from unsustainable extraction of biomass resources. This study projects the scale of the sustainable biomass resource base in the US southeast through 2030 under various scenarios of industry development and domestic market dynamics. We characterise this resource base at the county level, disaggregating it by material type and spatially constraining it to ensure biodiversity conservation. Our analysis shows that there could be as much as 70 million green metric tons of sustainable export potential from the US Southeast in 2030. However, we also show the extent to which sustainable sourcing criteria applied only to EU biomass energy imports could create leakage across biomass markets, erasing gains from any sustainability mandate. This leakage risk was fairly consistent across our study scenarios and time periods, ranging from 50 to over 63 million green tons of biomass per year. Meaningful biodiversity protections can only be achieved if sustainability criteria for biomass import to the EU are combined with more comprehensive support for sustainable sourcing across biomass industries in exporting regions. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

[1]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Status and prospects for renewable energy using wood pellets from the southeastern United States , 2017 .

[2]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Sustainability guidelines and forest market response: an assessment of European Union pellet demand in the southeastern United States , 2016 .

[3]  D. Saah,et al.  A global meta‐analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies , 2016 .

[4]  P. Dwivedi,et al.  Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects , 2015 .

[5]  Carly Whittaker,et al.  How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues , 2015 .

[6]  Christopher S. Galik Exploring the determinants of emerging bioenergy market participation , 2015 .

[7]  A. Faaij,et al.  Global solid biomass trade for energy by 2020: an assessment of potential import streams and supply costs to North‐West Europe under different sustainability constraints , 2015 .

[8]  Paul Beier,et al.  Rarity-Weighted Richness: A Simple and Reliable Alternative to Integer Programming and Heuristic Algorithms for Minimum Set and Maximum Coverage Problems in Conservation Planning , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  Martin Junginger,et al.  The economic potential of wood pellet production from alternative, low-value wood sources in the southeast of the U.S. , 2014 .

[10]  F. Aguilar,et al.  Non-industrial private forest owner's willingness-to-harvest: How higher timber prices influence woody biomass supply , 2014 .

[11]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Potential greenhouse gas benefits of transatlantic wood pellet trade , 2014 .

[12]  L. Sokka,et al.  Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment – a review , 2013 .

[13]  H. MacLean,et al.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Christopher S. Galik,et al.  Forest biomass supply in the southeastern United States - implications for industrial roundwood and bioenergy production. , 2009 .

[15]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[16]  R. Matthews,et al.  Carbon Impacts of Biomass Consumed in the EU: quantitative assessment , 2015 .

[17]  Giuntoli Jacopo,et al.  Solid and gaseous bioenergy pathways: input values and GHG emissions , 2014 .

[18]  Giuntoli Jacopo,et al.  Carbon accounting of forest bioenergy : Conclusions and recommendations from a critical literature review , 2014 .

[19]  D. Wear,et al.  The Southern Forest Futures Project: technical report , 2013 .

[20]  J. Howard,et al.  U.S. timber production, trade, consumption and price statistics 1965-2011. , 2013 .

[21]  Al Schuler,et al.  Status and trends for the U.S. forest products sector: a technical document supporting the forest service 2010 RPA assessment. , 2012 .

[22]  Joseph L. Conrad,et al.  Wood-energy market impact on competition, procurement practices, and profitability of landowners and forest products industry in the U.S. south , 2011 .

[23]  Kenneth E. Skog,et al.  U.S. forest products module : a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment , 2011 .

[24]  R. Haynes An analysis of the timber situation in the United States : 1952 to 2050 , 2003 .

[25]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[26]  Frederick W. Cubbage,et al.  Southern Forest Resource Assessment Using the Subregional Timber Supply (SRTS) Model , 2000 .