Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach

Abstract This paper provides a framework for addressing recreation as an example of Cultural Ecosystem Services and a methodology to support landscape management based on recreation activities at a regional scale. A GIS-based approach was used to estimate and map ecological and social factors illustrating recreation supply and demand in the Basque Country (northern Spain). The proposed methodology for recreation supply was based on recreation potential and accessibility, and the social demand was determined using a convenience sample of 629 persons that reported preferences for recreation activities using photo-questionnaires. Results showed that 23% of the viewsheds showed a high demand and higher recreation potential than accessibility, whereas only 3% showed a high demand and higher accessibility than potential. Approximately 74% of the territory showed a medium-low demand. We concluded that people׳s assessments on the basis of their aesthetic preferences may serve as a reasonable proxy for mapping recreation demand. The proposed visual method is fast, efficient and may be easily replicable in other regions. The proposed framework can be used as an input to support landscape management, to identify areas most demanded by society and to quantify spatially recreation supply and demand for supporting political strategies.

[1]  N. McClintock,et al.  Urban Livestock Ownership, Management, and Regulation in the United States: An Exploratory Survey and Research Agenda , 2014 .

[2]  Lin Zhen,et al.  Comparing patterns of ecosystem service consumption and perceptions of range management between ethnic herders in Inner Mongolia and Mongolia , 2010 .

[3]  Laura Nahuelhual,et al.  Mapping recreation and ecotourism as a cultural ecosystem service: an application at the local level in Southern Chile. , 2013 .

[4]  T. Lynam,et al.  Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Greg Brown,et al.  Public Participation GIS: A Method for Identifying Ecosystem Services , 2012 .

[6]  Patricia Balvanera,et al.  Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review , 2012 .

[7]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[8]  M. Pérez-Soba,et al.  Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU , 2014 .

[9]  A. Crowe,et al.  Trialling a method to quantify the ‘cultural services’ of the English landscape using Countryside Survey data , 2012 .

[10]  N. Crossman,et al.  Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: Where, what, and how? , 2010 .

[11]  M. Onaindia,et al.  Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity , 2011 .

[13]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[14]  M. Onaindia,et al.  Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation , 2013 .

[15]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[16]  J. Loidi,et al.  Vegetation Science and the implementation of the Habitat Directive in Spain: up-to-now experiences and further development to provide tools for management , 2007 .

[17]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[18]  T. Daw,et al.  Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[19]  D. Semmens,et al.  A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[20]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  Assessment of landscape aesthetics—Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty , 2013 .

[21]  P. Verburg,et al.  Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape , 2014 .

[22]  Iris Heller,et al.  Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe , 2009, Environmental management.

[23]  K. Chan,et al.  Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values , 2012 .

[24]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Solutions for sustaining natural capital and ecosystem services , 2012 .

[25]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services , 2012 .

[26]  Christina C. Hicks,et al.  A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations , 2013 .

[27]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  Louise Willemen,et al.  Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review , 2012 .

[29]  W. Haider,et al.  Would You Displace? It Depends! A Multivariate Visual Approach to Intended Displacement from an Urban Forest Trail , 2007 .

[30]  Elisabeth Conrad,et al.  Understanding public perceptions of landscape: A case study from Gozo, Malta , 2011 .

[31]  Catharina J.E. Schulp,et al.  Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets , 2012 .

[32]  R. Ryan.  The social landscape of planning: Integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information , 2011 .

[33]  K. Gaston,et al.  Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity , 2007, Biology Letters.

[34]  C. Raymond,et al.  The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment , 2007 .

[35]  M. Onaindia,et al.  Use of native species to improve carbon sequestration and contribute towards solving the environmental problems of the timberlands in Biscay, northern Spain. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  H. Wittmer,et al.  “Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making , 2013 .

[37]  G. Fry,et al.  The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  Stephen G. Sutton,et al.  Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia , 2012 .

[39]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: Methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1 , 2011 .

[40]  R. Manning,et al.  Tradeoffs Among Resource, Social, and Managerial Conditions on Mountain Summits of the Northern Forest , 2011 .

[41]  J. Hanspach,et al.  Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research , 2013 .

[42]  L. Hein,et al.  Spatial characterization of landscape functions , 2008 .

[43]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning , 2012 .

[44]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.