A techno-economic comparison between two design configurations for a small scale, biomass-to-energy gasification based system

Abstract Biomass has great potential as a clean and renewable feedstock for producing modern energy carriers. This paper focuses on the process of biomass gasification, wherein the synthesis gas is subsequently used to produce electricity. A comparison between the most promising design configurations for the industrial application of gasification based, biomass-to-energy cogenerators in the 100–600 kWe range is presented. Mass and energy balances and material and substance flow analyses drawn for each design solutions are based on the experimental data obtained from a pilot scale bubbling fluidized bed air gasifier, having a feeding capacity of 100 kg/h and operated with a commercially available, natural biomass. Measurements taken during the experimental tests include the syngas complete composition as well as the characterization of the bed material, the entrained fines collected at the cyclone and the purge material from the scrubber. The techno-economic performances of two energy generation devices, a gas engine and an externally-fired gas turbine, have been estimated on the basis of the manufacturer's specifications. The study concludes that the internal combustion engine layout is the solution that currently offers the higher reliability and provides the higher internal rate of return for the investigated range of electrical energy production.

[1]  A. Demirbas,et al.  Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals , 2001 .

[2]  L. Fiori,et al.  Biomass as an energy source: thermodynamic constraints on the performance of the conversion process. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[3]  Yan Lin,et al.  Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[4]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Flamelet Motion in Premixed Turbulent Axisymmetric Rod-Stabilized and Bunsen Flames , 2010 .

[5]  M. Hanna,et al.  Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. , 2008 .

[6]  Fabrizio Bezzo,et al.  A techno-economic comparison between two technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose. , 2009 .

[7]  Peter C. Flynn,et al.  The impact of feedstock cost on technology selection and optimum size. , 2007 .

[8]  A. Bridgwater.  The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation , 1995 .

[9]  N. A. Weil,et al.  A theoretical‐empirical approach to the mechanism of particle entrainment from fluidized beds , 1958 .

[10]  Charles C. Watson,et al.  Strategy of Process Engineering , 1968 .

[11]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification , 2007 .

[12]  R. W. Rousseau,et al.  Elementary principles of chemical processes , 1978 .

[13]  William R. Park.  Cost Engineering Analysis: A Guide to the Economic Evaluation of Engineering Projects , 1973 .

[14]  Paola Lettieri,et al.  Techno-economic performance of energy-from-waste fluidized bed combustion and gasification processes in the UK context , 2009 .

[15]  J. Azevedo,et al.  Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data , 2005 .

[16]  Carlos A Cardona,et al.  Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Olivine as tar removal catalyst for biomass gasifiers: Catalyst characterization , 2005 .

[18]  M. Mastellone,et al.  Scenarios of Waste Management for a Waste Emergency Area , 2009 .

[19]  Daniele Cocco,et al.  Performance evaluation of small size externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) power plants integrated with direct biomass dryers , 2006 .

[20]  P. M. Pelagagge,et al.  Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables , 2005 .

[21]  Forbes R McDougall,et al.  Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Lifecycle Inventory , 1995 .

[22]  Joan Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives , 2000 .

[23]  P. Basu.  Combustion and gasification in fluidized beds , 2006 .

[24]  U. Arena,et al.  Gasification of Natural and Waste Biomass in a Pilot Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor , 2010 .

[25]  Maria Laura Mastellone,et al.  Recursive Operability Analysis of a pilot plant gasifier , 2008 .

[26]  K. Thambimuthu,et al.  A critical review of syngas cleaning technologies — fundamental limitations and practical problems , 2008 .

[27]  Olivier Le Corre,et al.  Combustion of Syngas in Internal Combustion Engines , 2008 .

[28]  R. Chirone,et al.  Biomass gasification in a catalytic fluidized reactor with beds of different materials , 2009 .

[29]  B. Jenkins.  A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling , 1997 .

[30]  M. Mastellone,et al.  Tar removal during the fluidized bed gasification of plastic waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[31]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[32]  Vera Susanne Rotter,et al.  Material flow analysis of RDF-production processes. , 2004, Waste management.

[33]  P. Paul,et al.  Biomass derived producer gas as a reciprocating engine fuel—an experimental analysis , 2001 .

[34]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes , 2003 .