Interruption reduction in secondary substations using battery energy storage systems

Reliable electric power supply is extremely important in modern societies. Distribution system operators (DSOs) are obligated to ensure high supply security, especially in deregulated electricity markets. DSO face penalties or pay compensatory costs when they are unable to supply electricity reliably to customers. DSOs can increase their supply reliability by either employing expensive high-reliability technology or backup power supply such as battery energy storage systems (BESSs) or generators. We have presented a novel mixed integer linear programming model to determine the economic feasibility of installing BESSs at a secondary substation in a medium voltage network. We have also determined the minimum capacity and optimal schedule of the installed BESS. Moreover, we have examined the cost-effectiveness of using BESSs if they are also used for peak shaving instead of remaining idle when there are no outages. We validated our simple but effective methodology by applying it to a substation network in Finland. All the interruptions were reduced with a BESS capacity of 112 kWh, and the savings were significant for BESS costs less than 300 €/kWh. Moreover, peak shaving increased the cost savings. However, the current costs of lithium-ion-based BESSs are nearly thrice as high, and they must decrease further before BESSs can be cost-effectively used for interruption management and peak shaving.

[1]  R. Entriken,et al.  Impacts of extreme events on transmission and distribution systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  Lukas G. Swan,et al.  Selection of battery technology to support grid-integrated renewable electricity , 2012 .

[3]  J. David Lankutis,et al.  Putting a Price on Power Interruptions: How Utilities and Customers Can Share Interruption Costs , 2016, IEEE Industry Applications Magazine.

[4]  Sanna Syri,et al.  CorrigendumCorrigendum to “Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis” [Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 42 (2015) 569–596] , 2016 .

[5]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Corrigendum to: Electrical energy storage systems , 2016 .

[6]  Jihong Wang,et al.  Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation , 2015 .

[7]  Remus Teodorescu,et al.  Operation of a Grid-Connected Lithium-Ion Battery Energy Storage System for Primary Frequency Regulation: A Battery Lifetime Perspective , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[8]  Sinan Kufeoglu,et al.  A review on the theory of electric power reliability worth and customer interruption costs assessment techniques , 2016, 2016 13th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[9]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis , 2015 .

[10]  Jukka Lassila,et al.  PROFITABILITY OF UNDERGROUND CABLING IN THE FINNISH RURAL ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION IN THE FUTURE , 2015 .

[11]  Jaerventausta Pertti,et al.  PROFITABILITY OF DIFFERENT LI-ION BATTERIES AS BACK-UP POWER IN LVDC DISTRIBUTION NETWORK , 2016 .

[12]  Matti Lehtonen,et al.  Customer interruption costs calculation of finnish electricity customers , 2015, 2015 12th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM).

[13]  CICStorage,et al.  Economics of Electric Energy Storages in Electricity Distribution , .

[14]  Per Bengtsson,et al.  Reliability-based planning in rural areas; goals, methods, prioritization, and follow-up at Fortum Distribution , 2009 .